Literature DB >> 26631616

The Landscape of Prognostic Outlier Genes in High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Shuang G Zhao1, Joseph R Evans2, Vishal Kothari2, Grace Sun2, Ashley Larm2, Victor Mondine2, Edward M Schaeffer3, Ashley E Ross3, Eric A Klein4, Robert B Den5, Adam P Dicker5, R Jeffrey Karnes6, Nicholas Erho7, Paul L Nguyen8, Elai Davicioni7, Felix Y Feng9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a clear need to improve risk stratification and to identify novel therapeutic targets in aggressive prostate cancer. The goal of this study was to investigate genes with outlier expression with prognostic association in high-risk prostate cancer patients as potential biomarkers and drug targets. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We interrogated microarray gene expression data from prostatectomy samples from 545 high-risk prostate cancer patients with long-term follow-up (mean 13.4 years). Three independent clinical datasets totaling an additional 545 patients were used for validation. Novel prognostic outlier genes were interrogated for impact on oncogenic phenotypes in vitro using siRNA-based knockdown. Association with clinical outcomes and comparison with existing prognostic instruments was assessed with multivariable models using a prognostic outlier score.
RESULTS: Analysis of the discovery cohort identified 20 prognostic outlier genes. Three top prognostic outlier genes were novel prostate cancer genes; NVL, SMC4, or SQLE knockdown reduced migration and/or invasion and outlier expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis. Increased prognostic outlier score was significantly associated with poor prognosis independent of standard clinicopathologic variables. Finally, the prognostic outlier score prognostic association is independent of, and adds to existing genomic and clinical tools for prognostication in prostate cancer (Decipher, the cell-cycle progression signature, and CAPRA-S).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study represents the first unbiased high-throughput investigation of prognostic outlier genes in prostate cancer and demonstrates the potential biomarker and therapeutic importance of this previously unstudied class of cancer genes. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26631616     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

1.  Contemporary Role of the Decipher® Test in Prostate Cancer Management: Current Practice and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Deepansh Dalela; Björn Löppenberg; Akshay Sood; Jesse Sammon; Firas Abdollah
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2016

2.  Tumor subtype defines distinct pathways of molecular and clinical progression in primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Deli Liu; Michael A Augello; Ivana Grbesa; Davide Prandi; Yang Liu; Jonathan E Shoag; R Jeffrey Karnes; Bruce J Trock; Eric A Klein; Robert B Den; Francesca Demichelis; Elai Davicioni; Andrea Sboner; Christopher E Barbieri
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Structural Analysis Reveals Features of Ribosome Assembly Factor Nsa1/WDR74 Important for Localization and Interaction with Rix7/NVL2.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Lo; Erin M Romes; Monica C Pillon; Mack Sobhany; Robin E Stanley
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Overexpression of SMC4 predicts a poor prognosis in cervical cancer and facilitates cancer cell malignancy phenotype by activating NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Hui He; Cui Zheng; Yunxian Tang
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.174

5.  A transcriptomic signature for prostate cancer relapse prediction identified from the differentially expressed genes between TP53 mutant and wild-type tumors.

Authors:  Wensheng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Prostate cancer biomarkers: Are we hitting the mark?

Authors:  Shannon McGrath; Daniel Christidis; Marlon Perera; Sung Kyu Hong; Todd Manning; Ian Vela; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-07-29

7.  Overexpression of SMC4 activates TGFβ/Smad signaling and promotes aggressive phenotype in glioma cells.

Authors:  L Jiang; J Zhou; D Zhong; Y Zhou; W Zhang; W Wu; Z Zhao; W Wang; W Xu; L He; Y Ma; Y Hu; W Zhang; J Li
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.485

Review 8.  Applications of circulating tumor cells for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shirley Cheng; Jie-Fu Chen; Yi-Tsung Lu; Leland W K Chung; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Edwin M Posadas
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-09-14

9.  Development of a Prognostic Five-Gene Signature for Diffuse Lower-Grade Glioma Patients.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Wenhao Liu; Shun-Bin Luo; Fu-Chen Xie; Xiao-Jun Liu; Ren-Ai Xu; Lixi Chen; Zhilin Su
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  SFRP4 gene expression is increased in aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elise Sandsmark; Maria K Andersen; Anna M Bofin; Helena Bertilsson; Finn Drabløs; Tone F Bathen; Morten B Rye; May-Britt Tessem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.