Literature DB >> 26631143

Can explicit visual feedback of postural sway efface the effects of sensory manipulations on mediolateral balance performance?

L Eduardo Cofré Lizama1, Mirjam Pijnappels2, N Peter Reeves3, Sabine M P Verschueren4, Jaap H van Dieën5.   

Abstract

Explicit visual feedback on postural sway is often used in balance assessment and training. However, up-weighting of visual information may mask impairments of other sensory systems. We therefore aimed to determine whether the effects of somatosensory, vestibular, and proprioceptive manipulations on mediolateral balance are reduced by explicit visual feedback on mediolateral sway of the body center of mass and by the presence of visual information. We manipulated sensory inputs of the somatosensory system by transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on the feet soles (TENS) of the vestibular system by galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) and of the proprioceptive system by muscle-tendon vibration (VMS) of hip abductors. The effects of these manipulations on mediolateral sway were compared with a control condition without manipulation under three visual conditions: explicit feedback of sway of the body center of mass (FB), eyes open (EO), and eyes closed (EC). Mediolateral sway was quantified as the sum of energies in the power spectrum and as the energy at the dominant frequencies in each of the manipulation signals. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to test effects of each of the sensory manipulations, of visual conditions and their interaction. Overall, sensory manipulations increased body sway compared with the control conditions. Absence of normal visual information had no effect on sway, while explicit feedback reduced sway. Furthermore, interactions of visual information and sensory manipulation were found at specific dominant frequencies for GVS and VMS, with explicit feedback reducing the effects of the manipulations but not effacing these.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balance; posture; sensory weighting; sway

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26631143     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00103.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  A Human-machine-interface Integrating Low-cost Sensors with a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation System for Post-stroke Balance Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Deepesh Kumar; Abhijit Das; Uttama Lahiri; Anirban Dutta
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Age effects on mediolateral balance control.

Authors:  L Eduardo Cofré Lizama; Mirjam Pijnappels; Gert H Faber; Peter N Reeves; Sabine M Verschueren; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Design and Validation of a Low-Cost Portable Device to Quantify Postural Stability.

Authors:  Yong Zhu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Control of human gait stability through foot placement.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Balance Adaptation While Standing on a Compliant Base Depends on the Current Sensory Condition in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Efficacy of sitting balance training with delayed visual feedback among patients with stroke: a randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Kota Sawa; Kazu Amimoto; Abdul Chalik Meidian; Keisuke Ishigami; Takuya Miyamoto; Chika Setoyama; Rikuya Suzuki; Miko Tamura; Mitsusuke Miyagami
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  Where to Step? Contributions of Stance Leg Muscle Spindle Afference to Planning of Mediolateral Foot Placement for Balance Control in Young and Old Adults.

Authors:  Mina Arvin; Marco J M Hoozemans; Mirjam Pijnappels; Jacques Duysens; Sabine M Verschueren; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Effect of Eye-Object Distance on Body Sway during Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation.

Authors:  Osamu Aoki; Yoshitaka Otani; Shinichiro Morishita
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-10-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.