Tomohide Yoshie1, Toshihiro Ueda2, Tatsuro Takada2, Shinji Nogoshi2, Takayuki Fukano2, Yasuhiro Hasegawa3. 1. Department of Strokology, Stroke Center, St. Marianna University Toyoko Hospital, 3-435, Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211-0063, Japan. tomohide.yoshie.1215@marianna-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Strokology, Stroke Center, St. Marianna University Toyoko Hospital, 3-435, Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211-0063, Japan. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Neurology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS) is an uncommon but serious complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CT perfusion imaging (CTP) with acetazolamide challenge to identify patients at risk for HPS after CAS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients who underwent CTP with rest and acetazolamide challenge before CAS. CTP maps were assessed for absolute and relative cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and change of each parameter before and after acetazolamide challenge. Patients were divided into two groups according to the HPS after the CAS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the most accurate CTP parameter for the prediction of HPS. RESULTS: Nine of 113 patients had HPS. There were significant differences for absolute and relative values of resting CBF (p = 0.001 and p = 0.026), resting MTT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004), post-acetazolamide CBF (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), post-acetazolamide MTT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), and % changes of CBF (p = 0.009) between the HPS and non-HPS groups. ROC curve analysis showed that the CTP parameters with the maximal area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for HPS was the absolute value of post-acetazolamide MTT (AUC 0.909) and the absolute value of resting MTT (AUC 0.896). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment CTP with acetazolamide challenge could identify patients at risk for HPS after CAS. Although the CTP parameter that most accurately identified patients at risk for HPS was the absolute value of post-acetazolamide MTT, resting MTT was sufficiently accurate.
INTRODUCTION:Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (HPS) is an uncommon but serious complication of carotid artery stenting (CAS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CT perfusion imaging (CTP) with acetazolamide challenge to identify patients at risk for HPS after CAS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients who underwent CTP with rest and acetazolamide challenge before CAS. CTP maps were assessed for absolute and relative cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and change of each parameter before and after acetazolamide challenge. Patients were divided into two groups according to the HPS after the CAS. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the most accurate CTP parameter for the prediction of HPS. RESULTS: Nine of 113 patients had HPS. There were significant differences for absolute and relative values of resting CBF (p = 0.001 and p = 0.026), resting MTT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004), post-acetazolamide CBF (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), post-acetazolamideMTT (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), and % changes of CBF (p = 0.009) between the HPS and non-HPS groups. ROC curve analysis showed that the CTP parameters with the maximal area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for HPS was the absolute value of post-acetazolamideMTT (AUC 0.909) and the absolute value of resting MTT (AUC 0.896). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment CTP with acetazolamide challenge could identify patients at risk for HPS after CAS. Although the CTP parameter that most accurately identified patients at risk for HPS was the absolute value of post-acetazolamideMTT, resting MTT was sufficiently accurate.
Authors: T Fukuda; K Ogasawara; M Kobayashi; N Komoribayashi; H Endo; T Inoue; Y Kuzu; H Nishimoto; K Terasaki; A Ogawa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Walther N K A van Mook; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Geert Willem Schurink; Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Paul A M Hofman; Peter W de Leeuw Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245