Literature DB >> 26630947

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.

Michaela Jurakova1, Martin Huser2, Ivan Belkov3, Petr Janku3, Robert Hudecek3, Petr Stourac4, Jiri Jarkovsky5, Pavel Ventruba3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient's life quality.
RESULTS: Of 285 patients assessed for eligibility, a total of 93 patients (32.6 %) were randomized into TOT (n = 48) and SIS groups (n = 45). There were no significant differences in either operating time or blood loss. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in pain scores three (5.6 ± 1.8 vs 3.1 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) and 12 h postoperatively (3.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.1 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). After 1 year, there were no significant differences between the TOT and SIS groups in objective cure rates (87.0 % vs 90.9 %; p = 0.399) or patient-reported success rates (91.3 % vs 93.2 %; p = 0.999). Incidence of postoperative de novo urgency did not differ between TOT and SIS patients. Both groups registered a significant improvement in quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ophira SIS procedure has 1-year success rates comparable to standard TOT with significantly less groin pain in the early postoperative period. Both methods were safe and effective in terms of postoperative urgency and life quality improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Mid-urethral sling; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial; Single-incision sling; Stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26630947     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  19 in total

1.  Randomized trial of a comparison of the efficacy of TVT-O and single-incision tape TVT SECUR systems in the treatment of stress urinary incontinent women--2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jaromir Masata; Kamil Svabik; Karel Zvara; Petra Drahoradova; Rachid El Haddad; Petr Hubka; Alois Martan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karlijn J Schweitzer; Alfredo L Milani; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven; Dirk A Gietelink; Eric Hallensleben; Geert-Jan Cromheecke; Carl H van der Vaart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations.

Authors:  P E Petros; U I Ulmsten
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Abigail A Ford; Lynne Rogerson; June D Cody; Joseph Ogah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Miniarc single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Kennelly; Robert Moore; John N Nguyen; James Lukban; Steven Siegel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucyana M Djehdian; Maita P Araujo; Claudia C Takano; Carlos A Del-Roy; Marair G F Sartori; Manoel J B C Girão; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Arjun Nambiar; June D Cody; Stephen T Jeffery
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-01

8.  Prospective Randomized Study of MiniArc and Ajust Single Incision Sling Procedures.

Authors:  Alois Martan; Jan Krhut; Jaromír Mašata; Kamil Švabík; Michael Halaška; Lukáš Horčička; Roman Zachoval
Journal:  Low Urin Tract Symptoms       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.592

9.  Multicenter prospective randomized study of single-incision mini-sling vs tension-free vaginal tape-obturator in management of female stress urinary incontinence: a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alyaa Mostafa; Wael Agur; Mohamed Abdel-All; Karen Guerrero; Chu Lim; Mohamed Allam; Mohamed Yousef; James N'Dow; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  What is the best indication for single-incision Ophira Mini Sling? Insights from a 2-year follow-up international multicentric study.

Authors:  Paulo Palma; Cassio Riccetto; Elaine Bronzatto; Rodrigo Castro; Sebastian Altuna
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  1 in total

1.  Focusing on long-term complications of mid-urethral slings among women with stress urinary incontinence as a patient safety improvement measure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Lin; Cheng-Kai Lee; Shuenn-Dyh Chang; Pei-Chun Chien; Yu-Ying Hsu; Ling-Hong Tseng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.