| Literature DB >> 26629994 |
Christine Bonnal1, Christopher Leleu2,3, Olivier Brugière4, Christian Chochillon5, Raphael Porcher6, Pierre-Yves Boelle2,7, Jean Menotti1,8, Sandrine Houze5,9, Jean-Christophe Lucet3,10, Francis Derouin1,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspergillus colonisation is frequently reported after lung transplantation. The question of whether aspergillus colonisation is related to the hospital environment is crucial to prevention.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26629994 PMCID: PMC4667873 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient characteristics.
| Colonised | Non-colonised | All patients | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients, (n) | 12 | 32 | 44 | ||
| Age (y), mean ± SD (range) | 56 ± 8 (36–65) | 54 ± 10 (31–69) | 54 ± 9 (31–69) | >0,25 | |
| Male gender | 9 (75) | 24 (75) | 33 (75) | >0,25 | |
| Underlying disease | |||||
| Pulmonary emphysema | 7 (58) | 10 (31) | 17 (39) | >0,25 | |
| Idiop. pulm. fibrosis | 3 (25) | 1 (3) | 4 (9) | 0,19 | |
| COPD | 4 (34) | 16 (50) | 20 (45) | >0,25 | |
| Other | 0 | 2 (6,5) | 2 (5) | >0,25 | |
| Smoking | 11 (92) | 24 (75) | 35 (80) | >0,25 | |
| Diabetes | 3 (25) | 4 (13) | 7 (16) | >0,25 | |
| Positive CMV status | 8 (67) | 20 (63) | 28 (64) | >0,25 | |
| Before transplantation status | |||||
| Anti- | 0 | 2 (6) | 2 (5) | >0,25 | |
| Aspergillus colonisation | 1 (8) | 4 (13) | 5 (11) | >0,25 | |
| Antifungal treatment | 2 (17) | 5 (16) | 7 (16) | >0,25 | |
| Type of transplantation | |||||
| Single-lung | 7 (58) | 19 (59) | 26 (59) | >0,25 | |
| Double-lung | 5 (42) | 13 (41) | 18 (41) | >0,25 | |
| Two-year follow-up | |||||
| Mortality | 1 (8) | 13 (41) | 14 (32) | 0.06 | |
| Invasive aspergillosis | 0 | 2 (6) | 2 (4.5) | >0.25 |
All values are n (%), unless indicated
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Idiop. pulm. Fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CMV, cytomegalovirus; Ab, antibody
Eight patients (18%) died during their post-operative hospital stay, but none from fungal infection. Non-colonised patients had a higher mortality than colonised patients (p = 0,06).
No patient developed invasive aspergillosis during the study period. Twelve patients (27%) had transient AC (certain: 2, probable: 10), without associated manifestation of aspergillosis. All colonised patients had single species colonisation. Their clinical and biological characteristics are presented in Table 2. AC occurred 1 to 13 weeks after transplant (median, 5 weeks); it lasted from 1 to 2 weeks. AC occurred in the SICU and LTU in 4 and 8 cases, respectively.
Characteristics of 12 patients with Aspergillus spp. colonisation after transplantation.
| Patient | Type of transplantation | Underlying disease | First day of AC (Ward) | Duration of AC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Double-lung | Emphysema | 33 (SICU) | 1 |
|
| 3 | Double-lung | Emphysema | 35 (LTU) | 2 |
|
| 6 | Single-lung | Idiopathic fibrosis | 91 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 11 | Single-lung | Emphysema | 21 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 14 | Single-lung | Idiopathic fibrosis | 32 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 22 | Single-lung | Idiopathic fibrosis | 69 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 23 | Single-lung | Idiopathic fibrosis | 8 (SICU) | 2 |
|
| 25 | Double-lung | Emphysema/COPD | 6 (SICU) | 2 |
|
| 26 | Single-lung | Idiopathic fibrosis | 49 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 32 | Double-lung | Emphysema | 69 (LTU) | 1 |
|
| 34 | Single-lung | Emphysema | 14 (SICU) | 1 |
|
| 36 | Double-lung | Emphysema | 38 (LTU) | 1 |
|
*Duration expressed in weeks
Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LTU, lung transplant unit; SICU, surgical intensive care unit
Comparison of ITS, beta-tubulin and actin sequences of clinical isolates of Aspergillus and isolates of the same species collected from the environment.
| ITS | Beta-tubulin | Actin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference: clinical isolate, patient no 3 — | |||||
| Environmental isolates | |||||
| Unit's care station | 06/01/2010 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Corridor | 06/01/2010 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Television | 06/15/2010 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| Corridor | 06/15/2010 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Unit's care station | 06/15/2010 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Ramp | 06/15/2010 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Corridor | 06/22/2010 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Television | 06/22/2010 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Reference: clinical isolate, patient no 25 — | |||||
| Environmental isolates | |||||
| Television | 01/18/2011 | D | D | D | |
| Corridor | 02/08/2011 | 0 | 1 | ND | |
| Unit's care station | 02/08/2011 | D | D | D | |
| Reference: clinical isolate, patient no 26 – | |||||
| Environmental isolates | |||||
| Ramp | 03/15/2011 | D | D | D | |
| Floor | 03/22/2011 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| Ramp | 03/29/2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Results are expressed in number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (or deletion when indicated), compared with the sequence of the clinical isolate
*Deletion of one nucleotide; D: sequence with more than three single nucleotide polymorphisms; ND: not determined
Univariate and multivariate analysis of relationships between fungal contamination and Aspergillus colonisation (Cox proportional hazards model).
| Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (IC95%) | P-value | aHR (IC95%) | P-value | ||
|
| |||||
| Air | |||||
| Patient room | 0.50 (0.16–1.62) | 0.25 | 0.42 (0.12–1.46) | 0.17 | |
| Corridor | 0.78 (0.23–2.72) | 0.7 | |||
| Nurse’s station | 0.93 (0.24–3.58) | 0.92 | |||
| Air (all 3) | 0.32 (0.08–1.30) |
| |||
| Surface (patient room) | |||||
| Bed | 1.57 (0.45–5.49) | 0.48 | |||
| Table | 1.24 (0.26–5.89) | 0.79 | |||
| Fluid supply ramp | 1.71 (0.37–7.89) | 0.49 | |||
| Floor | 1.17 (0.35–3.93) | 0.8 | |||
| Window/TV | 1.62 (0.47–5.61) | 0.45 | |||
| Any (among 5) | 0.61 (0.07–5.14) | 0.66 | |||
|
| |||||
| Air | |||||
| Patient room | 2.71 (0.85–8.63) |
| 3.79 (1.07–13.5) |
| |
| Corridor | 0.52 (0.11–2.47) | 0.42 | |||
| Nurse’s station | 1.07 (0.28–4.03) | 0.92 | |||
| Air (all 3) | 1.25 (0.39–4.01) | 0.7 | |||
| Surface (patient room) | |||||
| Bed | 1.06 (0.13–8.67) | 0.95 | |||
| Table | 1.89 (0.24–15.2) | 0.55 | |||
| Fluid supply ramp | 1.57 (0.47–5.21) | 0.46 | |||
| Floor | 1.88 (0.49–7.19) | 0.36 | |||
| Window/TV | 0.87 (0.19–4.08) | 0.86 | |||
| Any (among 5) | 1.58 (0.46–5.41) | 0.46 | |||
|
| |||||
| Air | |||||
| Patient room | Undefined | 1 | |||
| Corridor | 0.54 (0.07–4.32) | 0.56 | |||
| Nurse’s station | 2.45 (0.49–12.2) | 0.27 | |||
| Air (all 3) | 0.65 (0.14–3.03) | 0.59 | |||
| Surface (patient room) | |||||
| Bed | Undefined | 1 | |||
| Table | Undefined | 1 | |||
| Fluid supply ramp | Undefined | 1 | |||
| Floor | 9.7 (0.98–96.3) |
| 10.52 (0.95–117) |
| |
| Window/TV | 3.5 (0.39–31.1) | 0.26 | |||
| Any (among 5) | 2.75 (0.58–13.0) | 0.2 | |||