Literature DB >> 2662991

[Detection and assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in head-neck tumors. A comparison of methods].

W Heppt1, J Haels, T Lenarz, U Mende, G Gademann.   

Abstract

From 1984 to 1987, seventy-two patients with squamous cell carcinomas involving oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx and cervical lymph nodes, who underwent surgery, were examined to determine the value of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), high-resolution real-time sonography (US) and palpation in preoperative staging of cervical nodal metastases. The clinical staging was compared with the microscopic findings in the neck specimens and with operative reports. For the identification and description of cervical lymph node metastases, US and CT are more valuable than MR and palpation. In comparison to CT, however, US has advantages in most cervical areas as a dynamic method with variable representation of interesting regions. False positive errors are related to confusion with inflammatory nodes in all examinations. Metastatic infiltration of surrounding tissue especially of neck vessels, are best recognised by means of US and MR. However, the high rates of sensitivity and low rates of specificity of all methods point to the possibility of a great number of false positive errors in demonstrating tissue infiltration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662991     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-998346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  3 in total

1.  Modern imaging techniques and ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology for the assessment of neck node metastases: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  M W van den Brekel; J A Castelijns; H V Stel; R P Golding; C J Meyer; G B Snow
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of the N0 neck in carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract: current status of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  M Lenz; B Kersting-Sommerhoff; M Gross
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [18F]FDG imaging of head and neck tumours: comparison of hybrid PET and morphological methods.

Authors:  S Dresel; J Grammerstorff; K Schwenzer; K Brinkbäumer; R Schmid; T Pfluger; K Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.