Literature DB >> 26629624

Vaccine Efficacy Against a New Avian Influenza (H9N2) Field Isolate from the Middle East (Serology and Challenge Studies).

Saad Gharaibeh1, Shadi Amareen2.   

Abstract

Avian influenza subtype H9N2 is endemic in many countries in the Middle East. The reported prevalence of infection was variable between countries and ranged from 28.7% in Tunisia to 71% in Jordan. Several commercial killed whole-virus vaccine products are used as monovalent or bivalent mixed with Newcastle disease virus. Recently, we have noticed that many of the vaccinated broiler flocks did not show a production advantage over nonvaccinated flocks in the field. A new avian influenza field virus (H9N2) was isolated from these vaccinated and infected broiler flocks in 2013. This virus had 89.1% similarity of its hemagglutinin (HA) gene to the classical virus used for manufacturing the classical vaccine. Inactivated autogenous vaccine was manufactured from this new field isolate to investigate its serological response and protection in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) and breeder-male chickens compared to the classical vaccine. Oropharyngeal virus shedding of vaccinated breeder-male chickens was evaluated at 3, 9, 10, and 14 days postchallenge (DPC). Percentage of chickens shedding the virus at 3 DPC was 64%, 50%, and 64% in the classical vaccine group, autogenous vaccine group, and the control challenged group, respectively. At 7 DPC percentage of virus shedding was 42%, 7%, and 64% in the classical vaccine group, autogenous vaccine group, and the control challenged group, respectively. At 10 DPC only 9% of classical vaccine group was shedding the virus and there was no virus shedding in any of the groups at 14 DPC. There was statistical significance difference (P < 0.05) in shedding only at 7 DPC between the autogenous vaccine group and the other two groups. At 42 days of age (14 DPC), average body weight was 2.720, 2.745, 2.290, and 2.760 kg for the classical vaccine group, autogenous vaccine group, control challenged group, and control unchallenged group, respectively. Only the control challenged group had significantly (P < 0.05) lower average body weight. In another experiment, vaccinated SPF chicks had hemagglutination inhibition (HI) geometric mean titers (GMTs), with classical antigen, of 8.7 and 3.1 log 2 for classical and autogenous vaccine groups, respectively. When the autogenous antigen was used for HI, GMTs were 6.0 and 8.1 log 2, respectively. Both vaccines protected against body weight suppression after challenge. However, autogenous vaccine elicited significantly higher HI titer and reduced viral shedding at 7 DPC. In conclusion, it is important to revise the vaccine virus strains used in each region to protect against and control infection from new field strains. Further field experiments are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of new vaccines under field conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H9N2; avian influenza; chicken; serology; vaccine; virus shedding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26629624     DOI: 10.1637/11123-050615-Reg

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of autogenous and commercial H9N2 avian influenza vaccines in a challenge with recent dominant virus.

Authors:  M H Fallah Mehrabadi; A Ghalyanchilangeroudi; S A Ghafouri; H Hosseini; M T Zabihi Petroudi; A Modiri Hamadan; H Rezaee; P Motamed Chaboki; S Vatandour; A Shayeganmehr
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.376

2.  Within-host model of respiratory virus shedding and antibody response to H9N2 avian influenza virus vaccination and infection in chickens.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Xie; Alexander Yitbarek; Jake Astill; Shirene Singh; Salah Uddin Khan; Shayan Sharif; Zvonimir Poljak; Amy L Greer
Journal:  Infect Dis Model       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 3.  A brief summary of the epidemiology and genetic relatedness of avian influenza H9N2 virus in birds and mammals in the Middle East and North Africa.

Authors:  A Nagy; T C Mettenleiter; E M Abdelwhab
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 4.  Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics for food producing animals. Part 2: new approaches and potential solutions.

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Lisa Bielke; Damer P Blake; Eric Cox; Simon M Cutting; Bert Devriendt; Elisabeth Erlacher-Vindel; Evy Goossens; Kemal Karaca; Stephane Lemiere; Martin Metzner; Margot Raicek; Miquel Collell Suriñach; Nora M Wong; Cyril Gay; Filip Van Immerseel
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Evaluation in broilers of aerosolized nanoparticles vaccine encapsulating imuno-stimulant and antigens of avian influenza virus/Mycoplasma gallisepticum.

Authors:  Taha Kumosani; Soonham Yaghmoor; Wesam H Abdulaal; Elie Barbour
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.