L Barbera1, H Seow2, R Sutradhar3, A Chu3, F Burge4, K Fassbender5, K McGrail6, B Lawson4, Y Liu3, R Pataky7, A Potapov5. 1. Odette Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON; ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; ; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON; 2. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON; ; Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; 3. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON; 4. Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; 5. Department of Oncology, Division of Palliative Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB; 6. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; 7. Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, BC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quality of data comparing care at the end of life (eol) in cancer patients across Canada is poor. This project used identical cohorts and definitions to evaluate quality indicators for eol care in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents during fiscal years 2004-2009 used administrative health care data to examine health service quality indicators commonly used and previously identified as important to quality eol care: emergency department use, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, chemotherapy, physician house calls, and home care visits near the eol, as well as death in hospital. Crude and standardized rates were calculated. In each province, two separate multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with receiving aggressive or supportive care. RESULTS: Overall, among the identified 200,285 cancer patients who died of their disease, 54% died in a hospital, with British Columbia having the lowest standardized rate of such deaths (50.2%). Emergency department use at eol ranged from 30.7% in Nova Scotia to 47.9% in Ontario. Of all patients, 8.7% received aggressive care (similar across all provinces), and 46.3% received supportive care (range: 41.2% in Nova Scotia to 61.8% in British Columbia). Lower neighbourhood income was consistently associated with a decreased likelihood of supportive care receipt. INTERPRETATION: We successfully used administrative health care data from four Canadian provinces to create identical cohorts with commonly defined indicators. This work is an important step toward maturing the field of eol care in Canada. Future work in this arena would be facilitated by national-level data-sharing arrangements.
BACKGROUND: The quality of data comparing care at the end of life (eol) in cancerpatients across Canada is poor. This project used identical cohorts and definitions to evaluate quality indicators for eol care in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of cancer decedents during fiscal years 2004-2009 used administrative health care data to examine health service quality indicators commonly used and previously identified as important to quality eol care: emergency department use, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, chemotherapy, physician house calls, and home care visits near the eol, as well as death in hospital. Crude and standardized rates were calculated. In each province, two separate multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with receiving aggressive or supportive care. RESULTS: Overall, among the identified 200,285 cancerpatients who died of their disease, 54% died in a hospital, with British Columbia having the lowest standardized rate of such deaths (50.2%). Emergency department use at eol ranged from 30.7% in Nova Scotia to 47.9% in Ontario. Of all patients, 8.7% received aggressive care (similar across all provinces), and 46.3% received supportive care (range: 41.2% in Nova Scotia to 61.8% in British Columbia). Lower neighbourhood income was consistently associated with a decreased likelihood of supportive care receipt. INTERPRETATION: We successfully used administrative health care data from four Canadian provinces to create identical cohorts with commonly defined indicators. This work is an important step toward maturing the field of eol care in Canada. Future work in this arena would be facilitated by national-level data-sharing arrangements.
Entities:
Keywords:
Palliative care; health services research; quality indicators
Authors: Frank D Ferris; Heather M Balfour; Karen Bowen; Justine Farley; Marsha Hardwick; Claude Lamontagne; Marilyn Lundy; Ann Syme; Pamela J West Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lisa Barbera; Jonathan Sussman; Raymond Viola; Amna Husain; Doris Howell; S Lawrence Librach; Hugh Walker; Rinku Sutradhar; Carole Chartier; Lawrence Paszat Journal: Healthc Policy Date: 2010-02
Authors: V Mock; A Atkinson; A Barsevick; D Cella; B Cimprich; C Cleeland; J Donnelly; M A Eisenberger; C Escalante; P Hinds; P B Jacobsen; P Kaldor; S J Knight; A Peterman; B F Piper; H Rugo; P Sabbatini; C Stahl Journal: Oncology (Williston Park) Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 2.990
Authors: Monica Beccaro; Massimo Costantini; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Guido Miccinesi; Maria Grimaldi; Paolo Bruzzi Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R S Pritchard; E S Fisher; J M Teno; S M Sharp; D J Reding; W A Knaus; J E Wennberg; J Lynn Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anna Santos Salas; Sharon M Watanabe; Yoko Tarumi; Tracy Wildeman; Ana M Hermosa García; Bisi Adewale; Wendy Duggleby Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sharon M Watanabe; Viane Faily; Asifa Mawani; Ann Huot; Yoko Tarumi; Alexei Potapov; Konrad Fassbender; Alysa Fairchild; Anil A Joy; Karen M King; Wilson Roa; Christopher P Venner; Vickie E Baracos Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-06-09
Authors: Laura M Perry; Leah E Walsh; Ronald Horswell; Lucio Miele; San Chu; Brian Melancon; John Lefante; Christopher M Blais; James L Rogers; Michael Hoerger Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Carlos R Torres-Cintrón; Diego E Zavala-Zegarra; Axel Gierbolini-Bermúdez; María R Ramos-Fernández Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-02