Literature DB >> 26628678

Effects of β-Blockers With and Without Vasodilating Properties on Central Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in Hypertension.

Giacomo Pucci1, Maria Giovanna Ranalli1, Francesca Battista1, Giuseppe Schillaci2.   

Abstract

β-Blockers are less effective than other antihypertensive drug classes in reducing central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) as compared with peripheral SBP (pSBP). Whether this effect is less pronounced with vasodilating β-blockers (VBB) when compared with nonvasodilating β-blockers (NVBB) remains unsettled. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials exploring the effects of β-blockers on both pSBP and cSBP in hypertension. We selected 20 studies, for a total of 32 treatment arms (n=21 for NVBB, n=11 for VBB) and 1263 participants (n=962 for NVBB, n=301 for VBB). pSBP decreased from 150 to 133 mm Hg for NVBB and from 145 to 134 mm Hg for VBB. cSBP decreased from 137 to 126 mm Hg for NVBB and from 132 to 123 mm Hg for VBB. SBP amplification (pSBP-cSBP) decreased significantly under VBB (-5.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -7.8, -3.4 mm Hg), but not under NVBB (-1.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -3.4, +1.2 mm Hg; P<0.01 versus NVBB). There was high heterogeneity both within and between β-blockers subclasses. In a meta-regression model, the weighted difference in treatment-induced changes in SBP amplification between NVBB and VBB lost its significance after adjustment for mean age and baseline pSBP and heart rate (-2.9±2.3 mm Hg; P=0.22) and was almost abolished after adjustment for treatment-induced heart rate changes (-0.1±0.5 mm Hg; P=0.78). In conclusion, NVBBs, but not VBBs, determine a lower reduction in cSBP than in pSBP. However, the difference in treatment-induced SBP amplification changes between NVBB and VBB is nearly abolished after accounting for differences in heart rate changes.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antihypertensive agents; aortic blood pressure; beta-adrenergic blockers; blood pressure; confidence intervals; heart rate; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26628678     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  6 in total

Review 1.  Beta-blockers for hypertension.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Hazel A Bradley; Jimmy Volmink; Bongani M Mayosi; Lionel H Opie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Heart rate reduction decreases central blood pressure in sick sinus syndrome patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker.

Authors:  Tuuli Teeäär; Martin Serg; Kaido Paapstel; Jaak Kals; Mart Kals; Mihkel Zilmer; Jaan Eha; Priit Kampus
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Comprehensive Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line β-Blocker Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients: A Large-Scale Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Seng Chan You; Harlan M Krumholz; Marc A Suchard; Martijn J Schuemie; George Hripcsak; RuiJun Chen; Steven Shea; Jon Duke; Nicole Pratt; Christian G Reich; David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan; Rae Woong Park; Sungha Park
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Cochrane corner: beta-blockers for hypertension.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Hazel A Bradley; Jimmy Volmink; Bongani M Mayosi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Targeting Beta-Blocker Drug-Drug Interactions with Fibrinogen Blood Plasma Protein: A Computational and Experimental Study.

Authors:  Michael González-Durruthy; Riccardo Concu; Laura F Osmari Vendrame; Ivana Zanella; Juan M Ruso; M Natália D S Cordeiro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Atenolol's Inferior Ability to Reduce Central vs Peripheral Blood Pressure Can Be Explained by the Combination of Its Heart Rate-Dependent and Heart Rate-Independent Effects.

Authors:  Tuuli Teeäär; Martin Serg; Kaido Paapstel; Mare Vähi; Jaak Kals; John R Cockcroft; Mihkel Zilmer; Jaan Eha; Priit Kampus
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.420

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.