Literature DB >> 26628522

The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions.

Thomas W McDowell1, Daniel E Welcome2, Christopher Warren2, Xueyan S Xu2, Ren G Dong2.   

Abstract

Mechanical arm systems are commonly used to support powered hand tools to alleviate ergonomic stressors related to the development of workplace musculoskeletal disorders. However, the use of these systems can increase exposure times to other potentially harmful agents such as hand-transmitted vibration. To examine how these tool support systems affect tool vibration, the primary objectives of this study were to characterize the vibration emissions of typical portable pneumatic grinders used for surface grinding with and without a mechanical arm support system at a workplace and to estimate the potential risk of the increased vibration exposure time afforded by the use of these mechanical arm systems. This study also developed a laboratory-based simulated grinding task based on the ISO 28927-1 (2009) standard for assessing grinder vibrations; the simulated grinding vibrations were compared with those measured during actual workplace grinder operations. The results of this study demonstrate that use of the mechanical arm may provide a health benefit by reducing the forces required to lift and maneuver the tools and by decreasing hand-transmitted vibration exposure. However, the arm does not substantially change the basic characteristics of grinder vibration spectra. The mechanical arm reduced the average frequency-weighted acceleration by about 24% in the workplace and by about 7% in the laboratory. Because use of the mechanical arm system can increase daily time-on-task by 50% or more, the use of such systems may actually increase daily time-weighted hand-transmitted vibration exposures in some cases. The laboratory acceleration measurements were substantially lower than the workplace measurements, and the laboratory tool rankings based on acceleration were considerably different than those from the workplace. Thus, it is doubtful that ISO 28927-1 is useful for estimating workplace grinder vibration exposures or for predicting workplace grinder acceleration rank orders. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HAVS; exposure estimation; grinding; musculoskeletal injury; portable grinders; risk assessment; vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26628522      PMCID: PMC4779390          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mev084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  9 in total

1.  Motion times, hand forces, and trunk kinematics when using material handling manipulators in short-distance transfers of moderate mass objects.

Authors:  M A Nussbaum; D B Chaffin; B S Stump; G Baker; J Foulke
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Upper limb mechanical changes following short duration repetitive eccentric exertions.

Authors:  Mary E Sesto; Robert G Radwin; Thomas M Best; Terry G Richard
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Mechanical impedance and absorbed power of hand-arm under x(h)-axis vibration and role of hand forces and posture.

Authors:  Yasser Aldien; Pierre Marcotte; Subhash Rakheja; Paul-Emile Boileau
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  A new approach to characterize grip force applied to a cylindrical handle.

Authors:  Ren G Dong; John Z Wu; Daniel E Welcome; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip strength applied on a cylindrical handle.

Authors:  Bryan Wimer; Ren G Dong; Daniel E Welcome; Christopher Warren; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Prolonged mechanical and physiological changes in the upper extremity following short-term simulated power hand tool use.

Authors:  Amrish O Chourasia; Mary E Sesto; Walter F Block; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Can we explain the exposure variability found in hand-arm vibrations when using angle grinders? A round robin laboratory study.

Authors:  I Liljelind; J Wahlström; L Nilsson; M Persson; T Nilsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.

Authors:  D B Chaffin; B S Stump; M A Nussbaum; G Baker
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Variability in hand-arm vibration during grinding operations.

Authors:  Ingrid Liljelind; Jens Wahlström; Leif Nilsson; Allan Toomingas; Lage Burström
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2011-02-21
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Contact area affects frequency-dependent responses to vibration in the peripheral vascular and sensorineural systems.

Authors:  Kristine Krajnak; G R Miller; Stacey Waugh
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-11-27

Review 2.  Health effects associated with occupational exposure to hand-arm or whole body vibration.

Authors:  Kristine Krajnak
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Tool-specific performance of vibration-reducing gloves for attenuating fingers-transmitted vibration.

Authors:  Daniel E Welcome; Ren G Dong; Xueyan S Xu; Christopher Warren; Thomas W McDowell
Journal:  Occup Ergon       Date:  2016
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.