M T Xu1, S Sun1, L Zhang2, F Xu3, S L Du2, X D Zhang4, D W Wang2. 1. Department of Joint Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng Clinical School, Taishan Medical University, Liaocheng, Shandong Province, China. 3. Central Laboratory, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng Clinical School, Taishan Medical College, Liaocheng, Shandong Province, China. 4. Department of Pathology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng Clinical School, Taishan Medical University, Liaocheng, Shandong Province, China.
Abstract
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are important regulators of bone repair and regeneration. In this study, we examined whether TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expressions were delayed during bone healing in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Tibial fractures were created in 95 diabetic and 95 control adult male Wistar rats of 10 weeks of age. At 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks after fracture induction, five rats were sacrificed from each group. The expressions of TGF-β1 and BMP2 in the fractured tibias were measured by immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, weekly for the first 5 weeks post-fracture. Mechanical parameters (bending rigidity, torsional rigidity, destruction torque) of the healing bones were also assessed at 3, 4, and 5 weeks post-fracture, after the rats were sacrificed. The bending rigidity, torsional rigidity and destruction torque of the two groups increased continuously during the healing process. The diabetes group had lower mean values for bending rigidity, torsional rigidity and destruction torque compared with the control group (P<0.05). TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expression were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the control group than in the diabetes group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3. Peak levels of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expression were delayed by 1 week in the diabetes group compared with the control group. Our results demonstrate that there was a delayed recovery in the biomechanical function of the fractured bones in diabetic rats. This delay may be associated with a delayed expression of the growth factors TGF-β1 and BMP-2.
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are important regulators of bone repair and regeneration. In this study, we examined whether TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expressions were delayed during bone healing in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Tibial fractures were created in 95 diabetic and 95 control adult male Wistar rats of 10 weeks of age. At 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks after fracture induction, five rats were sacrificed from each group. The expressions of TGF-β1 and BMP2 in the fractured tibias were measured by immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, weekly for the first 5 weeks post-fracture. Mechanical parameters (bending rigidity, torsional rigidity, destruction torque) of the healing bones were also assessed at 3, 4, and 5 weeks post-fracture, after the rats were sacrificed. The bending rigidity, torsional rigidity and destruction torque of the two groups increased continuously during the healing process. The diabetes group had lower mean values for bending rigidity, torsional rigidity and destruction torque compared with the control group (P<0.05). TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expression were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the control group than in the diabetes group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3. Peak levels of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 expression were delayed by 1 week in the diabetes group compared with the control group. Our results demonstrate that there was a delayed recovery in the biomechanical function of the fractured bones in diabeticrats. This delay may be associated with a delayed expression of the growth factors TGF-β1 and BMP-2.
There is strong evidence indicating that patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1)
have decreased bone mass and are at increased risk of fragility fractures (1
2
3
4
5). It is also established that defects in
osteoblast differentiation and activity are the main factors underlying bone fragility
in DM1 (6
7
8). Other contributing factors include an
accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the development of diabetes
complications, such as neuropathy and hypoglycemia, which cause a further decline in
bone mineral density (5). Several experimental
and clinical studies have documented an association between diabetes and impaired bone
healing (1,5,9,10). The existence of an elevated fracture risk in diabetes suggests the
involvement of pathogenic influences, such as hyperglycemia, on bones (1). Macey et al. (3) showed that the fracture callus from untreated diabeticrats exhibited 29%
lower tensile strength and 50% decreased stiffness compared with non-diabeticrats 2
weeks after the production of a closed fracture. Herbsman et al. (4) found a significant reduction in the tensile strength of a
fibular fracture in an alloxan-induced diabeticrat model at 4 weeks post-fracture.
Diabetes-associated conditions affect bone mass and bone quality (11,12). Experimental studies
have suggested that the malfunction of bone marrow-derived osteoclasts may contribute to
decreased cartilage resorption and delayed endochondral ossification in diabetes (13). However, the mechanisms of delayed fracture
healing in diabeticpatients or animal models remain unclear. Transforming growth factor
beta 1 (TGF-β1) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are two very important factors
in the process of bone healing (14
15
16
17
18
19). However, little is known about the
expression of TGF-β1 and BMP2 in the bone healing processes of patients with
diabetes.
Material and Methods
Diabetes model
The animal protocol for this investigation was approved by the Animal Ethics
Committee of Liaocheng People's Hospital, China. A total of 190 adult male Wistar
rats of 10 weeks of age (purchased from the Animal Experimental Centre of Medical
Department of Shandong University, China) were used in this study. Rats were divided
into two groups (n = 95 each), a control group and a diabetes group. The animals were
housed in groups, fed a diet of standard laboratory feed and were weighed daily for 7
days. Diabetes was induced in test rats by intraperitoneal injection of 160 mg/kg
alloxan and was defined as blood glucose levels of more than 16.7 mmol/L, which was
determined 2 days after alloxan injection. If the desired glucose level was not
achieved, an additional injection was given to achieve the appropriate level. Control
group rats (n=95) received intraperitoneal injection of placebo and served as
controls.
Fracture model
All studies were performed in rats with diabetes for 3 weeks prior to fracture.
Before the surgery, all animals, control and diabetic, were weighed and anesthetized
with 100 mg/kg ketamine. A 10×2.5×1.5 mm fracture was created in the middle of the
left tibia in all rats using a rongeur (Wego Ortho, China). All rats were injected
intramuscularly with penicillin (10,000 units) 3 days post-operation for infection
prevention. Fractures were allowed to heal for 5 weeks.
Biomechanical function measurement
Forty-five rats from each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at 3, 4, and
5 weeks post-fracture. The mechanical testing parameters were obtained by the
measurement of five animals in each group. The tibias were resected, stripped of the
surrounding soft tissues, and evaluated for bone healing by manual palpation. The
proximal and distal ends of the tibia were embedded in wood's metal alloy blocks, and
the diaphysis was wrapped in gauze soaked with normal saline. The tibias were then
mounted on a combined axial motion and torsional testing jig that was attached to a
biaxial material testing machine (MTS 858 Bionix, MTS Systems, USA). Three mechanical
testing parameters were measured in both diabetic and control rats. The tibias were
mounted so that vertically directed loads would create a three-point bending. The
samples were tested to failure in displacement control at a rate of 15 mm/min using a
biaxial material testing machine (MTS 858 Bionix). Failure was defined as the maximum
force of callus strength recorded during testing. A torque test was conducted to
failure at a rate of 15 mm/min. The bent rigidity, torsional rigidity, and
destruction torque were automatically calculated using MTS 858 Bionix software.
Histomorphometry studies
At 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks post-fracture, five rats were sacrificed from each group.
Twenty-five tibia samples were extracted and processed for histology by fixation in
10% neutral-buffered formalin for 24 h at 4°C. After washing with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) overnight, the tissues were decalcified with 0.36 mol/L ethylene diamine
tetraacetic acid (EDTA; pH 7.0-7.2) and embedded in paraffin. The samples were cut
into ∼5 µm-thick sagittal sections using a low-speed diamond saw. The sections were
then glued to microscope slides. The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin,
Alcian blue, or immunohistochemical stains. Immunohistochemistry was performed using
the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method. An SABC kit (purchased from Wuhan Boster
Biological Technology Ltd., China) was used for immunostaining with polyclonal
antibodies against BMP-2 (antibody BA0290) and TGF-β1 (antibody BA0290). After
deparaffinization and hydration, the specimens were treated with 0.01% trypsin
(Sigma, USA) for 30 min at 37°C. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with methanol
containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxide. Sections were incubated with PBS containing 5%
normal goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature to
eliminate nonspecific binding, followed by the appropriate concentrations of primary
antibodies at 4°C overnight in a humidified chamber. After washing with PBS
three-times for 5 min, sections were incubated with a biotinylated secondary antibody
and an avidin-biotin peroxidase complex in a humidified chamber for 30 min at room
temperature. Color was developed using 3, 39-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Dojindo
Chemical Laboratories, Japan). Finally, the sections were counterstained with
hematoxylin. As negative controls, PBS, normal rabbit IgG, or normal mouse IgG were
used instead of the primary antibodies. Gray scale images of TGF-β1 and BMP2 were
automatically recorded using Leica-QwinV3 image analysis software (Germany).
Twenty-five tibial samples were homogenized in a liquid nitrogen-cooled mortar.
Tissue powders were then processed for RNA extraction using the TriZol method. Using
the SuperScript™ first-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen, USA), 2.5 µg total RNA
was reverse-transcribed and the products were treated with RNase H before storing at
-20°C. Real-time PCR was performed on a real-time PCR detection system (MJ, Research
Opticon, USA). Using SYBR¯ green PCR Master Mix reagents (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA),
each reaction mixture consisted of 12.5 µL SYBR green PCR reagent, 2.5 µL of 1:50
diluted reverse-transcription product, 5 mM of primers, and
diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water, in a total volume of 25 µL. No template and
non-reverse-transcribed reactions were included in each PCR plate as negative
controls. 18S was used as an internal standard in each PCR plate. After 10 min at
95°C, the PCR amplification was performed for 40 cycles. Each cycle consisted of
amplification at 95°C for 50 s and 65°C for 30 s. The 7900 HT Real-Time PCR System
(Applied Biosystems, USA) was used to perform the reaction. The expression level was
normalized against endogenous GAPDH for related gene expression. Primer sequences for
qPCR are listed in Table 1.
Statistical analysis
The experimental data were analyzed using SPSS10. The paired designed T-test was used
to compare differences between groups. All data are reported as means±SE, and
differences were considered statistically significant when P<0. 05.
Results
Biomechanical function
The mechanical parameters (bending rigidity, torsional rigidity, destruction
torque) of the control and diabetes groups increased continuously throughout the
experimental period; however, two-way ANOVA revealed that the diabetes group had
significantly lower mean values for the bending rigidity, torsional rigidity and
destruction torque than the control group P<0.05 (Figure 1). Using biaxial material machine testing, bone
biomechanical functional recovery was well characterized by the three mechanical
testing parameters.
Figure 1
At each time point, the mean bending rigidity (A), mean
torsional rigidity (B), and mean destruction torque
(C) in the control group was greater compared to the
diabetes group (P<0.05, t-test). The means of five
independent experiments are shown for all conditions.
TGF-β1 histochemistry and immuno-histochemistry finding
The local expression of TGF-β1 during an early stage of healing is shown in Figure 2. In the control group at week 1
post-fracture, a moderate staining for TGF-β1 was seen in osteogenic cells,
fibroblast-like cells, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts in both the subperiosteal
bone and the trabecular bone near the endochondral ossification front. In the
diabetes group, moderate staining for TGF-β1 was only seen in osteogenic cells,
with weak staining in osteoblasts in both the subperiosteal bone and the
trabecular bone near the endochondral ossification front. At week 5, in control
group, moderate staining for TGF-β1 was seen in osteoblasts in both the
subperiosteal bone and the trabecular bone near to the endochondral ossification
front, with weak staining in osteogenic cells. In the diabetes group, moderate
staining for TGF-β1 was seen in osteoblasts in the subperiosteal bone and weak
staining was seen in osteogenic cells. No staining was seen in hypertrophic
chondrocytes in control or diabeticrats.
Figure 2
Local expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) during
fracture healing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes
(B) groups after 1 week of healing, 2 weeks of healing
(C) and (D), 3 weeks of healing
(E) and (F), 4 weeks of healing
(G) and (H), and 5 weeks of healing
(I) and (J), respectively (DAB ×200).
Red arrows: osteogenic cells; red arrowheads: osteoblasts in the
subperiosteal bone; black arrows: fibroblast-like cells; black arrowheads:
proliferating chondrocytes; blue arrows: mature chondrocytes; blue
arrowheads: osteoblasts in the trabecular bone near to endochondral
ossification front.
The gray scale intensity of TGF-β1 expression was higher in the diabetes group
than in the control group, with the differences being statistically significant
(P<0.05) at postoperative weeks 1, 2 and 3. However, there was no statistically
significant difference (P>0.05) at weeks 4 and 5. The gray scale intensities of
TGF-β1 expression are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3
Gray scale intensity of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1). The gray
scale intensity value of TGF-β1 expression was higher in the diabetes group
than in the control group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3. The difference
between groups was significant (*P<0.05,
t-test).
BMP-2 histochemistry and immuno-histochemistry findings
The local expressions of BMP-2 during an early stage of healing are shown in Figure 4. At week 1 post-fracture, in the
control group, moderate staining for BMP-2 was seen in osteogenic cells,
fibroblast-like cells or chondrocytes, osteoblasts in the subperiosteal bone,
proliferating chondrocytes and osteoblasts in the trabecular bone near the
endochondral ossification front. In the diabetes group, weak staining for BMP-2
was seen in osteogenic cells, osteoblasts in the subperiosteal bone, proliferating
chondrocytes and osteoblasts. At week 5 post-fracture, in the control group,
moderate staining for BMP-2 was seen in osteoblasts in the trabecular bone near
the endochondral ossification front and weak staining was seen in osteoblasts in
the subperiosteal bone and proliferating chondrocytes. In the diabetes group, weak
staining for BMP-2 was only seen in osteoblasts in the subperiosteal bone and
proliferating chondrocytes. No staining was seen at hypertrophic chondrocytes in
controls and diabeticrats.
Figure 4
Local expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) during fracture
healing is shown in the control (A) and diabetes
(B) groups after 1 week of healing, 2 weeks of healing
(C) and (D), 3 weeks of healing
(E) and (F), 4 weeks of healing
(G) and (H), and 5 weeks of healing
(I) and (J), respectively (DAB ×200).
Red arrows: osteogenic cells; red arrowheads: osteoblasts in the
subperiosteal bone; black arrows: fibroblast-like cells; black arrowheads:
proliferating chondrocytes; blue arrows: mature chondrocytes; blue
arrowheads: osteoblasts in the trabecular bone near to endochondral
ossification front.
The gray scale intensity of BMP-2 expression was higher in the diabetes group than
in the control group, with the differences between the two groups being
statistically significant (P<0.05) at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3. However,
there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) at weeks 4 and 5.
The gray scale intensities of BMP-2 expression are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Gray scale intensity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in the two
groups. The gray scale intensity value of BMP-2 expression was higher in the
diabetes group than in the control group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3.
The differences between the two groups was significant (*P<0.05,
t-test).
RT-PCR
The results of RT-PCR for TGF-β1 expression (Figure
6) suggest that TGF-β1 mRNA expression in the diabetes group was lower
than in the control group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, 3(P<0.05). However,
there was no statistical difference at week 4 and 5. TGF-β1 expression achieved
its highest level at week 4 in the diabetes group, but reached its highest level
at week 3 in the control group. Thus, peak TGF-β1 expression was delayed by 1 week
in the diabetes group compared with the control group.
Figure 6
Fluorogenic quantitative polymerase chain reaction results of
transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) mRNA expression in the two groups.
TGF-β1 gene expression in the diabetes group was lower than in the control
group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, 3 (*P<0.05, t-test).
However, there was no statistical difference at weeks 4 and 5. TGF-β1
expression achieved its highest level at week 4 in the diabetes group, but
reached its highest level at week 3 in the control group.
The results of RT-PCR for BMP-2 expression (Figure
7) suggest that BMP-2 mRNA expression in the diabetes group was lower
than in the control group at postoperative weeks 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.05). The
difference in expression was highest at postoperative week 2. BMP-2 expression
achieved its highest level at week 3 in the diabetes group, but reached its
highest level at week 2 in the control group. Thus, peak BMP-2 expression was also
delayed by 1 week in the diabetes group compared with the control group.
Figure 7
Fluorogenic quantitative polymerase chain reaction results of bone
morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) mRNA expression in the two groups. BMP-2
mRNA expression in the diabetes group was lower than in the control group at
postoperative weeks 1, 2, 3 (*P<0.05, t-test). BMP-2 expression achieved
its highest level at week 3 in the diabetes group, but reached its highest
level at week 2 in the control group.
Discussion
These results indicate distinctive differences in biomechanical functional recovery
in the early stages of fracture healing in the diabetes group compared with the
control group. Furthermore, the delayed bone functional recovery was well
characterized by the mechanical testing parameters in the diabetes group. In the
early intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification stages of
fracture-healing, the local expression of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 was strongly increased at
an early stage in the control group compared with the diabetes group, in all cells
(osteogenic cells, osteoblasts in the subperiosteal bone, fibroblast-like cells,
proliferating chondrocytes, mature chondrocytes, and osteoblasts in the trabecular
bone near to the endochondral ossification front). The delayed local expression of
the growth factors TGF-β1 or BMP-2 coincided with postponed biomechanical functional
recovery. These results indicate that diabetes affected fracture healing through the
local expression of growth factors in the early stages of healing.Both clinical and experimental studies have shown that diabetes affects fracture
healing (13, 20
21
22). Diabetes affects the biomechanical
properties of bone and results in decreased bone mechanical strength (23). In our mechanical experiment, bone
functional healing was well characterized by the testing parameters. It showed that
diabetes affected the biomechanical properties of bone, resulting in decreased
bending stiffness, torsional stiffness and the destruction of torque in the diabetes
group. The mechanism by which diabetes affects fracture healing remains unclear.
However, the role of cytokines in fracture healing has generated more attention in
the scientific community. In the fracture healing process, the expression levels of
insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2),
platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and TGF are
decreased in diabeticrats (24,25). TGF-β1 and bone morphogenetic proteins
(BMPs) are a group of multifunctional cytokines in the TGF superfamily that can
induce mesenchymal cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, eventually leading
to cartilage and bone formation (26). TGF-β1
has been shown to have a stimulating effect on bone healing (17-19
27). TGF-β1 regulates the growth and
differentiation of bone and cartilage cells, and promotes the expression and
influence of many growth factors in bone and cartilage tissue (28). In vitro TGF-β1 and BMP-2 exhibit a strong
ability to promote osteoblast differentiation and the induction of ossification
(29). TGF-β and BMP-2 could directly
promote the induction of bone resorption by mature osteoblasts (30
31
32). In our experiment, we found the local
expression of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 appeared in the intramembranous ossification and in
endochondral ossification; however, the local expression was lower in the diabetes
group than the control group. This suggested that diabetes might inhibit the
synthesis of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 and, consequently, affect the formation of bone and
cartilage. Furthermore, the change in the local expression of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 may
cause the synthesis and local expression of other cytokines, resulting in an
inhibition of new bone formation and bone reconstruction, eventually leading to
slower fracture healing.In diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia or insulin can influence the production of
pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory cytokines, which can affect proliferation,
migration and differentiation of callus cells, in particular osteoblasts, or other
blood cells (33). Consequently, delayed local
expression of TGF-β1 and BMP-2 further affects the maturation of osteoblasts and
cartilage cells. This reduces intramembranous ossification, endochondral bone
formation, and matrix synthesis. Our results support the treatment of bone fractures
in diabeticrats using cell growth factors (34). However, this should be done at an early stage of fracture healing.The mechanism by which the local expression of BMP-2 and TGF-β1 is delayed in
experimental diabetes is complex. Unlike the acute inflammatory phase of normal
healing, diabetics exhibit chronic moderate inflammation (35) that reduces the number and impairs the function of activated
macrophages and leads to reduced growth factor levels (36). Several cellular mechanisms have been proposed, including
depletion or dysfunction of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages, sustained
cytokine local expression and infiltration by inflammatory cells, decreased
production of growth factors, reduced cellular proliferation and extracellular matrix
synthesis, and increased production of proteolytic enzymes (37). Delayed growth factor production leads to impaired
angiogenesis, endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction, and fewer platelets, further
reducing granulation tissue formation, which in turn decreases growth factor
secretion in areas of wound healing (38).
These results suggest that the local administration of the growth factors at an early
stage of healing may promote fracture healing in diabetes mellitus.In the diabetes group, there was a delayed recovery of the biomechanical parameters
in the first 5 weeks following tibial fracture. The delayed recuperation of the
biomechanical parameters appears to be associated with delayed expression of the
growth factors TGF-β1 and BMP-2.
Authors: Loay Al-Zube; Eric A Breitbart; J Patrick O'Connor; J Russell Parsons; Gino Bradica; Charles E Hart; Sheldon S Lin Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: John L Fowlkes; R Clay Bunn; Lichu Liu; Elizabeth C Wahl; Hannah N Coleman; Gael E Cockrell; Daniel S Perrien; Charles K Lumpkin; Kathryn M Thrailkill Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2007-12-27 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Saad B Chaudhary; Frank A Liporace; Ankur Gandhi; Brian G Donley; Michael S Pinzur; Sheldon S Lin Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Kambiz Sarahrudi; Anita Thomas; Mehdi Mousavi; Georg Kaiser; Julia Köttstorfer; Mathias Kecht; S Hajdu; S Aharinejad Journal: Injury Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Ushashi C Dadwal; Caio de Andrade Staut; Nikhil P Tewari; Olatundun D Awosanya; Stephen K Mendenhall; Conner R Valuch; Rohit U Nagaraj; Rachel J Blosser; Jiliang Li; Melissa A Kacena Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Luke Watson; Xi Zhe Chen; Aideen E Ryan; Áine Fleming; Aoife Carbin; Lisa O'Flynn; Paul G Loftus; Emma Horan; David Connolly; Patrick McDonnell; Laoise M McNamara; Timothy O'Brien; Cynthia M Coleman Journal: Cells Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 6.600