Literature DB >> 26628087

Disengagement of general practitioners in cervical cancer screening.

Lorraine Poncet1, Laurent Rigal, Henri Panjo, Arnaud Gautier, Pierre Chauvin, Gwenn Menvielle, Emmanuelle Cadot, Virginie Ringa.   

Abstract

In the absence of organized cervical cancer screening (CCS) programs, gynecologists remain principal actors in obtaining a Pap smear, followed by general practitioners (GPs). In France, with the growing scarcity of gynecologists and social inequalities in access to opportunistic screening, GPs are valuable resources for women's gynecologic follow-up. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of GPs who do not perform CCS, analyzing the effect of GPs' sex and their evolution over time. On the basis of data from three cross-sectional surveys conducted among representative samples of French GPs in 1998, 2002, and 2009 (n=5199), we constructed univariate and multivariate logistic mixed models (level 2: county, level 1: GP) with random intercept stratified on GPs' sex to investigate the characteristics of the GPs associated with no practice of CCS ever. Almost one-third of all GPs did not perform CCS ever and it increased with time. Male GPs were always more likely not to perform it (odds ratio=0.50, 95% confidence interval=0.42-0.59). The percentage of GPs not performing CCS increased more markedly among male than among female GPs, and increased more among the youngest age group. Increasingly fewer GPs engage in CCS when the growing scarcity of medical gynecologists calls for more participation. Female GPs remain significantly more active in CCS than male GPs. The participation in CCS is determined differently according to the practitioner's sex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26628087     DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 0959-8278            Impact factor:   2.497


  5 in total

1.  Online study of health professionals about their vaccination attitudes and behavior in the COVID-19 era: addressing participation bias.

Authors:  Pierre Verger; Dimitri Scronias; Yves Fradier; Malika Meziani; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Chiara Maj; Lorraine Poncet; Henri Panjo; Arnaud Gautier; Pierre Chauvin; Gwenn Menvielle; Emmanuelle Cadot; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Barriers and attitudes towards cervical cancer screening in primary healthcare in Poland - doctors' perspective.

Authors:  Katarzyna Nessler; Francis Ball; Sze Kay Florence Chan; Michal Chwalek; Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka; Adam Windak
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Combined Effect of Health Status and Primary Care Use on Participation in Cancer Screening: The CONSTANCES Cohort.

Authors:  Thi-Van-Trinh Tran; Jeanna-Eve Franck; Mireille Cœuret-Pellicer; Laurent Rigal; Virginie Ringa; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 5.  National Data Analysis and Systematic Review for Human Resources for Cervical Cancer Screening in Japan.

Authors:  Chisato Hamashima; Seiju Sasaki; Satoyo Hosono; Keika Hoshi; Takafumi Katayama; Teruhiko Terasawa
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.