Literature DB >> 2662741

Prehospital use of APSAC: results of a placebo-controlled study.

A D Castaigne1, C Hervé, A M Duval-Moulin, M Gaillard, J L Dubois-Rande, C Boesch, M Wolf, D Lellouche, F Jan, P Vernant.   

Abstract

Thrombolytic treatment efficacy is greater when the delay between onset of pain and treatment is short. To give treatment before admission to a coronary care unit, responsibility needs to be transferred from cardiologists to other physicians working in mobile care units. We conducted a 2-part feasibility study to investigate this strategy. Part 1 evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of mobile care unit physicians. Results from this study indicate that with regard to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, the risk of a wrong diagnosis is low. Part 2 was a placebo-controlled trial involving 100 patients in which 57 received anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) (30 U) at home and 43 received placebo at home. Patients receiving placebo at home were reevaluated on arrival in a coronary care unit and received APSAC (30 U) if indicated. The main results were that (1) diagnostic accuracy was good--all patients had an acute coronary syndrome and 97 of 100 patients had myocardial infarction; (2) time gain was approximately 60 minutes; (3) coronary patency rate was 72%; (4) ejection fraction was higher in the prehospital group (56.7%) than in the control group (53.4%), but the difference was not significant; (5) there was no rhythmic or bleeding complication related to the prehospital treatment; (6) 5 patients died from cardiogenic shock--2 between home and hospital and 3 in the hospital (3 received thrombolytic treatment at home and 2 received placebo at home and APSAC in the hospital); and (7) prehospital administration of APSAC did not induce a delay in arrival to the coronary care unit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662741     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90927-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.

Authors:  S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: Risk Factors for Untimely Access.

Authors:  Renee Y Hsia; Yu-Chu Shen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 4.  [Acute coronary syndrome in the prehospital phase].

Authors:  J-H Schiff; H R Arntz; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Pharmacoeconomic aspects of treatment of acute myocardial infarction with thrombolytic agents.

Authors:  K S Woo; H D White
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Comparative tolerability profiles of thrombolytic agents. A review.

Authors:  K S Woo; H D White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Feasibility and timing of prehospital administration of reteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Donald G Rosenberg; Esther Levin; Ana Lausell; Allen Brown; John Gardner; Esther Perez; Mark Veenendaal; Yee S C Ong; Mary Gunn
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.300

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.