| Literature DB >> 26626880 |
Cristian Ferreira de Souza1, Reginaldo Peçanha Brazil2, Paula Dias Bevilacqua3, Jose Dilermando Andrade Filho4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phlebotomine sand flies are dipterans of the family Psychodidae. They are very important to veterinary medicine because some species are vectors of infective forms of Leishmania spp., the etiological agents of leishmaniasis. The Parque Estadual do Rio Doce is located in an area with constant reports of cases of leishmaniasis. In order to better understanding the phlebotamine sand fly fauna of the park, the present work was undertaken with the goal of analyzing phlebotomine sand flies collected there, verifying their seasonality and correlating their presence with forest and/or anthropic areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26626880 PMCID: PMC4667417 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1227-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1(1) Map of Parque Estadual do Rio Doce (PERD); (2) (○) White dots indicating the distribution of light traps along Juquita trail at PERD, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Source: https://maps.google.com.br/
Frequency of species of phlebotomine sand flies captured, according to sex, Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, Brazil, from September 2012 to February 2014
| Species | Male | Percent | Female | Percent | Total | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 6 | 0.49 | 6 | 0.30 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 42 | 3.45 | 42 | 2.11 |
|
| 54 | 6.96 | 0 | 0.00 | 54 | 2.71 |
|
| 40 | 5.15 | 0 | 0.00 | 40 | 2.01 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.16 | 2 | 0.10 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.05 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 0.33 | 4 | 0.20 |
|
| 20 | 2.58 | 1 | 0.08 | 21 | 1.05 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 45 | 3.70 | 45 | 2.26 |
|
| 28 | 3.61 | 143 | 11.75 | 171 | 8.58 |
|
| 198 | 25.52 | 183 | 15.04 | 381 | 19.12 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.05 |
|
| 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.05 |
|
| 18 | 2.32 | 294 | 24.16 | 312 | 15.65 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 4 | 0.33 | 4 | 0.20 |
|
| 3 | 0.39 | 41 | 3.37 | 44 | 2.21 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 7 | 0.58 | 7 | 0.35 |
|
| 141 | 18.17 | 85 | 6.98 | 226 | 11.34 |
|
| 139 | 17.91 | 67 | 5.51 | 206 | 10.34 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 7 | 0.58 | 7 | 0.35 |
|
| 16 | 2.06 | 48 | 3.94 | 64 | 3.21 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 5 | 0.41 | 5 | 0.25 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.15 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.15 |
|
| 97 | 12.50 | 59 | 4.85 | 156 | 7.83 |
|
| 1 | 0.13 | 16 | 1.31 | 17 | 0.85 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.15 |
|
| 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.16 | 2 | 0.10 |
|
| 2 | 0.26 | 20 | 1.64 | 22 | 1.10 |
|
| 1 | 0.13 | 4 | 0.33 | 5 | 0.25 |
|
| 1 | 0.13 | 46 | 3.78 | 47 | 2.36 |
|
| 16 | 2.06 | 75 | 6.16 | 91 | 4.57 |
| Total (%)a | 776(38.94) | 100.00 | 1217(61.06) | 100.00 | 1993 | 100.00 |
aComparison between the proportions of captured phlebotomine sand flies according to sex: z = 13.97; p <0,0001
Spearman correlation between captured phlebotomine sand flies and distance inside forest from the forest border, Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, Brazil, from September 2012 to February 2014
| Collect Place (m)ab | Consecrated phlebotomine sand flies vectorsb | Percent | Other phlebotomine sand flies species | Percent | Total | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 137 | 36.15 | 65 | 4.03 | 202 | 10.14 |
| 300 | 69 | 18.21 | 56 | 3.47 | 125 | 6.27 |
| 600 | 15 | 3.96 | 94 | 5.82 | 109 | 5.47 |
| 900 | 25 | 6.60 | 158 | 9.79 | 183 | 9.18 |
| 1200 | 26 | 6.86 | 270 | 16.73 | 296 | 14.85 |
| 1500 | 23 | 6.07 | 120 | 7.43 | 143 | 7.18 |
| 1800 | 21 | 5.54 | 257 | 15.92 | 278 | 13.95 |
| 2100 | 6 | 1.58 | 106 | 6.57 | 112 | 5.62 |
| 2400 | 7 | 1.85 | 145 | 8.98 | 152 | 7.63 |
| 2700 | 37 | 9.76 | 205 | 12.70 | 242 | 12.14 |
| 3000 | 3 | 0.79 | 35 | 2.17 | 38 | 1.91 |
| 3300 | 10 | 2.64 | 103 | 6.38 | 113 | 5.67 |
| Total (%) | 379(19.02) | 100.00 | 1.614(80.98) | 100.00 | 1993 | 100.00 |
aplaces where the traps were installed. distance from the beginning of the Juquita trail (forest boarder) into the forest. bCorrelation between the collect location and the number of phlebotomines considered. according to the literature. leishmaniasis vectors: n = 12; ρ = −0.6643. P > 0.0185. Documented phlebotomine sand flies vectors = Nyssomyia intermedia. Nyssomyia whitmani. Migonemyia migonei
Correlation between the number of captured phlebotomine sand flies and the mean and median of climatic variables during the period of collection in the Parque Estadual do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, Brazil. from September 2012 to February 2014
| Period | (%) | Rainfall (mm) | Humidity (%) | Temperature (°C) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| μ (%) | Med | SD | CV(%) | μ (%) | Med | SD | CV(%) | μ (%) | Med | SD | CV(%) | |||
| September/2012 | 19 | 0.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.1 | 60.0 | 15.1 | 25.12 | 20.4 | 19.6 | 3.3 | 16.18 |
| October /2012 | 71 | 3.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.6 | 48.0 | 14.8 | 29.25 | 21.7 | 21.7 | 3.3 | 15.21 |
| November /2012 | 51 | 2.56 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 78.7 | 79.0 | 9.1 | 11.56 | 24.4 | 24.3 | 2.4 | 9.84 |
| December /2012 | 180 | 9.03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.3 | 67.0 | 12.7 | 19.16 | 24.6 | 24.1 | 2.5 | 10.16 |
| January /2012a | 267 | 13.40 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| February /2012 | 163 | 8.18 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 300.00 | 64.5 | 66.0 | 12.4 | 19.22 | 25.2 | 24.7 | 2.7 | 10.71 |
| March/2012 | 238 | 11.94 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.8 | 76.0 | 9.0 | 11.87 | 25.3 | 25.2 | 2.6 | 10.28 |
| April/2012 | 208 | 10.44 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 271.42 | 89.3 | 91.0 | 5.6 | 6.27 | 22.1 | 22.0 | 1.5 | 6.79 |
| May /2012 | 169 | 8.48 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 78.0 | 82.0 | 11.4 | 14.62 | 21.0 | 20.0 | 2.7 | 12.86 |
| June/2012 | 74 | 3.71 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 79.2 | 82.0 | 12.1 | 15.28 | 19.3 | 18.7 | 2.7 | 13.99 |
| July /2012 | 133 | 6.67 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 76.4 | 80.0 | 11.2 | 14.66 | 21.0 | 20.2 | 2.8 | 13.33 |
| August /2012 | 68 | 3.41 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 61.6 | 60.0 | 14.7 | 23.86 | 21.6 | 20.5 | 3.5 | 16.20 |
| September /2012 | 49 | 2.46 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 62.0 | 63.0 | 15.5 | 25.00 | 22.1 | 21.0 | 3.2 | 14.48 |
| October /2012 | 8 | 0.40 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 125.00 | 94.1 | 95.0 | 3.6 | 3.83 | 15.7 | 15.5 | 0.9 | 5.73 |
| November/2012 | 71 | 3.56 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 189.47 | 80.3 | 86.0 | 16.3 | 20.30 | 21.3 | 20.4 | 2.9 | 13.62 |
| December/2012 | 173 | 8.68 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 314.28 | 74.0 | 73.0 | 16.1 | 21.76 | 25.7 | 24.6 | 4.0 | 15.56 |
| Janeiro/2012 | 32 | 1.61 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 64.0 | 61.0 | 12.1 | 18.91 | 25.9 | 25.7 | 3.5 | 13.51 |
| February/2012 | 19 | 0.95 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.3 | 59.0 | 15.1 | 25.04 | 25.3 | 24.2 | 3.3 | 13.04 |
| Total | 1.993 | 100.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Note aPeriod of deactivation of the meteorological station. μ - Mean; Med - Median; SD - Standard Deviation; CV - Coefficient of variation. Average rainfall: n = 17; ρ = 0.1530; P = 0.5577. Average humidity: n = 17; ρ = 0.2859; P = 0.2660. Average humidity: n = 17; ρ = 0.3163; P = 0.2161 Average temperature: n = 17; ρ = 0.2551; P = 0.3231. Average temperature: n = 17; ρ = 0.3043; P = 0.2350