| Literature DB >> 26626432 |
Pengfei Sun1, Cai Hui1, Naling Bai1, Shengmao Yang2, Li Wan3, Qichun Zhang4, YuHua Zhao1.
Abstract
In the present work, a novel bioflocculant, EPS-1, was prepared and used to flocculate theEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26626432 PMCID: PMC4667227 DOI: 10.1038/srep17465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Identification of strain DT.
(A) A transmission electron microscopic image of strain DT (the scale bar = 0.5 μm), and a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of strain DT and other related species based on 16S rDNA sequences. Bootstrap values (percentages of 1,000 replications) are shown at the branch points. The scale bar = 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position (evolutionary distance). (B) A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of strain DT and other related species based on gyrB sequences. Bootstrap values (percentages of 1,000 replications) are shown at the branch points. The scale bar = 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position (evolutionary distance).
Figure 2Characteristics of the bioflocculant EPS-1.
(A) Chemical composition analysis. (B) Protein profiles of the EPS-1 solution: the numbers (1–18) denote the different protein types; (C) Diagram of zeta potential of EPS-1 solution.
Figure 3Comparisons of the flocculating activities in untreated EPS-1 solution and solutions treated with either high temperature or proteinase K.
Figure 4Fourier transform-infrared spectrograms of the bioflocculant EPS-1.
Figure 5XPS analysis of the atomic composition of the bioflocculant EPS-1.
Box-Behnken Design arrangement and responses.
| Run | Code levels | FR (%) for kaolin suspension | FR (%) for | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | Actual value | Predicted value | Actual value | Predicted value | |
| 1 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 90.2768 | 90.7624 | 78.8569 | 78.0376 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 21.1022 | 20.8779 | 18.7850 | 17.9321 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 93.2260 | 93.1662 | 81.6147 | 82.8807 |
| 4 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 94.0286 | 94.3126 | 82.3741 | 81.9609 |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 17.3718 | 18.0816 | 12.7898 | 12.8233 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 15.3866 | 14.9010 | 10.9113 | 11.7306 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.9456 | 22.7276 | 19.2246 | 19.6376 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 93.9877 | 93.2780 | 81.0552 | 81.0217 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19.1278 | 22.7276 | 18.9049 | 19.6376 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 23.9973 | 24.2216 | 20.1039 | 20.9567 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 25.8084 | 26.5780 | 22.5020 | 21.2695 |
| 12 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 21.2536 | 21.3134 | 18.9729 | 17.7069 |
| 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22.0790 | 21.7949 | 18.2654 | 18.6786 |
| 14 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 28.0125 | 27.2429 | 18.1455 | 19.3780 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.1093 | 22.7276 | 20.7834 | 19.6376 |
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | DF | Mean Square | F Value | Prob > F | CoefficientEstimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For kaolin suspension | ||||||
| Model | 14820.9 | 9 | 1646.77 | 230.63 | 0 | |
| Residual | 35.7 | 5 | 7.14 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 2.9 | 3 | 0.98 | 0.06 | 0.976 | |
| Pure Error | 32.8 | 2 | 16.38 | |||
| Cor Total | 14856.6 | 14 | ||||
| R2 = 0.9976 | Adj. R2 = 0.9933 | Pred R2 = 0.9919 | C.V. = 4.42 | Adeq Precision = 26.890 | ||
| For | ||||||
| Model | 11695.7 | 9 | 1299.53 | 569.72 | 0 | |
| Residual | 11.4 | 5 | 2.28 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 9.4 | 3 | 3.13 | 3.10 | 0.254 | |
| Pure Error | 2.0 | 2 | 1.01 | |||
| Cor Total | 11707.1 | 14 | ||||
| R2 = 0.9990 | Adj. R2 = 0.9973 | Pred R2 = 0.9868 | C.V. = 4.42 | Adeq Precision = 26.890 | ||
Figure 6Flocculating activity of the bioflocculant EPS-1 against kaolin suspension and M. aeruginosa, given the optimal parameters.
The data represent averages of three independent experiments, with ± SD indicated by error bars.
Zeta potentials of these four different systems.
| Flocculation system | Zeta potential (mV) |
|---|---|
| Blank kaolin solution | 18.5 ± 0.98 |
| Kaolin flocculating system solution | 6.13 ± 0.29 |
| Blank | −22 ± 5.16 |
| −21.6 ± 2.91 |
Coding and levels of experiment factors.
| Factor | symbol | Code levels | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For kaolin suspension | For | ||||||
| −1 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| CaCl2 (g/L) | X1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| pH | X2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| EPS-1 (g/L) | X3 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |