Literature DB >> 2662628

Decision analysis in surgical education.

A S Elstein.   

Abstract

Surgical education can no longer be considered adequate if limited to description of surgical diseases and methods of management. Due to the growth in numbers of surgical diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, the surgeon of the future will find it increasingly necessary to understand the principles by which algorithms are constructed and by which individualized decisions should be made. Several systematic approaches for assisting clinical decision makers have been developed. Decision analysis is particularly appealing because it is flexible and readily adapted to a wide range of clinical situations. It explicitly guides the decision maker in determining the crucial variables in a clinical decision, and permits both objective data and personal preferences to play a part in decision making. Because it provides for personal estimates and preferences, decision analysis is not dehumanizing, even though it is quantitative, explicit, and mathematically rigorous. Topics for a series of seminars or case conferences are suggested. Decision analysis should be part of the intellectual preparation of every clinician.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662628     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Evaluating individualized medical decision analysis.

Authors:  B Littenberg; H C Sox
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions. A cognitive science approach.

Authors:  A J Moskowitz; B J Kuipers; J P Kassirer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Accepting error to make less error.

Authors:  H J Einhorn
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1986

Review 4.  Decision analysis.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Comparison of physicians' decisions regarding estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women and decisions derived from a decision analytic model.

Authors:  A S Elstein; G B Holzman; M M Ravitch; W A Metheny; M M Holmes; R B Hoppe; M L Rothert; D R Rovner
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The diagnosing mind.

Authors:  E J Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. 1968.

Authors:  H Raiffa
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

8.  Sounding board. Decision Analysis: a look at the chief complaints.

Authors:  W B Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-03-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Instruction in medical decision making. A report of two surveys.

Authors:  A S Elstein; B Dawson-Saunders; L J Belzer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Hidden ethical issues in clinical decision analysis.

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.