Sarah J Kenny1, Jackie L Whittaker2, Carolyn A Emery3. 1. Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Glen Sather Sports Medicine Clinic, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preprofessional dancers partake in rigorous training and have high injury prevalence. Attempts to identify risk factors for dance injuries have focused on a diversity of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate the evidence examining risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in preprofessional ballet and modern dancers. METHODS: Fifteen electronic databases were systematically searched to October 2015. Studies selected met a priori inclusion criteria and investigated musculoskeletal injury risk factors in preprofessional (elite adolescent, student, young adult) ballet and modern dancers. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality and level of evidence using the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and a modified Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 model, respectively. RESULTS: Of 1364 potentially relevant studies, 47 were included and scored. Inconsistent injury definition and methodology precluded meta-analysis. The most common modifiable risk factors investigated were anthropometrics (ie, body mass index, adiposity), joint range of motion (ie, lower extremity), dance exposure (ie, years training, exposure hours) and age. The median DB score across studies was 8/33 (range 2-16). The majority of studies were classified as level 3 evidence and few considered risk factor inter-relationships. There is some level 2 evidence that previous injury and poor psychological coping skills are associated with increased injury risk. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of high-quality studies, consensus regarding risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in preprofessional dancers remains difficult. There is a need for injury definition consensus and high-quality prospective studies examining the multifactorial relationship between risk factors and injury in preprofessional dance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: Preprofessional dancers partake in rigorous training and have high injury prevalence. Attempts to identify risk factors for dance injuries have focused on a diversity of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate the evidence examining risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in preprofessional ballet and modern dancers. METHODS: Fifteen electronic databases were systematically searched to October 2015. Studies selected met a priori inclusion criteria and investigated musculoskeletal injury risk factors in preprofessional (elite adolescent, student, young adult) ballet and modern dancers. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality and level of evidence using the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and a modified Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 model, respectively. RESULTS: Of 1364 potentially relevant studies, 47 were included and scored. Inconsistent injury definition and methodology precluded meta-analysis. The most common modifiable risk factors investigated were anthropometrics (ie, body mass index, adiposity), joint range of motion (ie, lower extremity), dance exposure (ie, years training, exposure hours) and age. The median DB score across studies was 8/33 (range 2-16). The majority of studies were classified as level 3 evidence and few considered risk factor inter-relationships. There is some level 2 evidence that previous injury and poor psychological coping skills are associated with increased injury risk. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of high-quality studies, consensus regarding risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in preprofessional dancers remains difficult. There is a need for injury definition consensus and high-quality prospective studies examining the multifactorial relationship between risk factors and injury in preprofessional dance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Afxentios Kekelekis; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Isabel Sarah Moore; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tom Hughes; Jamie C Sergeant; Danielle A van der Windt; Richard Riley; Michael J Callaghan Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Diana P A M van Winden; Rogier M Van Rijn; Angelo Richardson; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Raôul R D Oudejans; Janine H Stubbe Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2019-02-08
Authors: Adinda K E Mailuhu; Rogier M van Rijn; Janine H Stubbe; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Marienke van Middelkoop Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2021-06-08