Literature DB >> 26626222

Risks and Benefits of Pharmacological Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Patients Undergoing Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

Onder Kara1, Homayoun Zargar1, Oktay Akca1, Hiury S Andrade1, Peter Caputo1, Matthew J Maurice1, Daniel Ramirez1, Robert J Stein1, Jihad H Kaouk2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigate the safety and efficacy of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients treated with robotic partial nephrectomy at our center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined our robotic partial nephrectomy database for cases performed between 2006 and 2014. Clinical venous thromboembolism episodes within 6 months from surgery were documented. Patients were stratified according to the administration of pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis into pharmacological prophylaxis (222) and no pharmacological prophylaxis (762) groups. The groups were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes, complications and adverse hemorrhagic events defined as the administration of 2 or more units of red blood cells, the need for vascular embolization or any procedures related to blood loss.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the pharmacological prophylaxis and no pharmacological prophylaxis groups regarding mean operation time, median warm ischemia time and estimated blood loss. The rates of venous thromboembolism events were comparable between the groups (pharmacological prophylaxis 1.8% vs no pharmacological prophylaxis 2.1%, p=0.75). Overall 90% of venous thromboembolism events occurred within the first postoperative month. In the multivariable regression analysis encompassing pharmacological prophylaxis, perioperative aspirin intake, body mass index, operation time, Charlson comorbidity index, fellowship training and tumor complexity, operation time (OR 1.06, p=0.009) and Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.28, p <0.0001) were associated with adverse hemorrhagic events.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of pharmacological prophylaxis did not increase the rate of adverse hemorrhagic events. Isolated inpatient administration of pharmacological prophylaxis after robotic partial nephrectomy does not appear to protect against venous thromboembolism postoperatively in that the majority of venous thromboembolism events occurred within the first 30 days after surgery. Longer duration of pharmacological prophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after robotic partial nephrectomy should be considered.
Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nephrectomy; organ sparing treatments; prevention and control; robotics; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626222     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  2 in total

1.  Use of venous-thrombotic-embolic prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgery for renal tumors: a questionnaire survey in the Nordic countries (The NORENCA-2 study).

Authors:  Lars Lund; Harry Nisen; Petrus Järvinen; Magnus Fovaeus; Eirikur Gudmundsson; Bjarne Kromann-Andersen; Börje Ljungberg; Frode Nilsen; Pernilla Sundqvist; Peter E Clark; Christian Beisland
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-25

2.  Should aspirin be suspended prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Jonathan Doyun Cha; Willy Baccaglini; Fatima Z Husain; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Igor Nunes-Silva; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Alexandre Ingels; Paulo Priante Kayano; Oliver Rojas Claros; Natasha Kouvaleski Saviano Moran; René Sotelo; Gustavo Caserta Lemos
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-01-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.