Literature DB >> 26626133

Grant-Writing Pearls and Pitfalls: Maximizing Funding Opportunities.

Jeffrey C Liu1, Melissa A Pynnonen2, Maie St John3, Eben L Rosenthal4, Marion E Couch5, Cecelia E Schmalbach6.   

Abstract

This invited article reviews the grant process to include the following objectives: (1) to provide an understanding of otolaryngology funding mechanisms in the context of career progression; (2) to outline key components of a well-written grant; (3) to highlight vital members of a successful research team, with emphasis on the mentor-mentee relationship; and (4) to clarify grant scoring with emphasis on common pitfalls to avoid. Current otolaryngology funding mechanisms and up-to-date resources are provided. The review is aimed to assist otolaryngology residents, faculty new to the grant process, as well as experienced researchers striving to improve their grant review scores. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Keywords:  CORE; NIH; grant funding; research

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626133     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815620174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Jewel in the Crown: Specific Aims Section of Investigator-Initiated Grant Proposals.

Authors:  Richard J Santen; Eugene J Barrett; Helmy M Siragy; Leon S Farhi; Lauren Fishbein; Robert M Carey
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-08-17

2.  Practical Tools and Guidelines for Young Oncologists From Resource-Limited Settings to Publish Excellence and Advance Their Career.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Ouissam Al Jarroudi; Said Afqir
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.