Literature DB >> 26626091

Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight.

A Scollo1, B Contiero2, F Gottardo2.   

Abstract

Tail biting lesions have a negative effect on both the welfare of pigs and on the revenue of the pig farm. Due to the multifactorial nature of this abnormal behaviour and its sporadic onset, an epidemiological approach was adopted to identify the management and housing factors influencing the occurrence of tail biting and the frequency of bitten pigs in the weaning and fattening phases up to 170 kg live weight in heavy pig production. Data were collected from a sample of 67 commercial pig farms via an on-farm visit and a questionnaire to the farmer. Data collected included general farm information, hygiene and herd health, prevention, management, climate control, feeding and production traits. In the weaning phase, the occurrence of tail biting was increased by a factor of 16.64 for tipped vs. short-docked tails, by a factor of 68.09 when the observer detected poor air quality, and by a factor of 14.44 when the feeding time was variable. In fattening pigs, a high stocking density increased the risk of tail biting by a factor of 18.00. The frequency of lesions in weaners was greater in pigs with tipped tails (0.29 vs. 0.03%; P = 0.034), whereas in fatteners the frequency of lesions was greater when drinkers were not present in the lying area (0.71 vs. 0.05%; P = 0.009) and when air turnover was not detected in the barn (0.70 vs. 0.07%; P = 0.005). There was also a trend for increased tail biting when the stocking density was high (1.06 vs. 0.33%; P = 0.057). Many of the risk factors that emerged for heavy pigs in the present study could be easily managed to reduce the risk of tail biting and the frequency of tail lesions through the systematic evaluation and control of stocking density, climate, and feed and water management.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency; Heavy pig; Prevalence; Risk factors; Tail biting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626091     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  11 in total

1.  Effects of tail docking and tail biting on performance and welfare of growing-finishing pigs in a confinement housing system.

Authors:  Y Z Li; H F Zhang; L J Johnston; W Martin; J D Peterson; J F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Application of the voluntary human approach test on commercial pig fattening farms: a meaningful tool?

Authors:  Birte Wegner; Ines Spiekermeier; Hendrik Nienhoff; Julia Große-Kleimann; Karl Rohn; Henning Meyer; Heiko Plate; Hubert Gerhardy; Lothar Kreienbrock; Elisabeth Grosse Beilage; Nicole Kemper
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2020-08-12

4.  Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects.

Authors:  Mattia Bottacini; Annalisa Scollo; Sandra A Edwards; Barbara Contiero; Martina Veloci; Vincenzo Pace; Flaviana Gottardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Producer Perceptions of the Prevention of Tail Biting on UK Farms: Association to Bedding Use and Tail Removal Proportion.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Claire Barber
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Ear, tail and skin lesions vary according to different production flows in a farrow-to-finish pig farm.

Authors:  Alessia Diana; Laura Ann Boyle; Edgar García Manzanilla; Finola Catherine Leonard; Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2019-07-15

Review 7.  Rearing Pigs with Intact Tails-Experiences and Practical Solutions in Sweden.

Authors:  Torun Wallgren; Nils Lundeheim; Anna Wallenbeck; Rebecka Westin; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  A Review of the Effects of Non-Straw Enrichment on Tail Biting in Pigs.

Authors:  Stephanie Buijs; Ramon Muns
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.

Authors:  Laura A Boyle; Sandra A Edwards; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Françoise Pol; Manja Zupan Šemrov; Sabine Schütze; Janicke Nordgreen; Nadya Bozakova; Evangelia N Sossidou; Anna Valros
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-27

10.  Long-Term Measurement of Piglet Activity Using Passive Infrared Detectors.

Authors:  Roberto Besteiro; Tamara Arango; Juan Ortega; María D Fernández; Manuel R Rodríguez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.