| Literature DB >> 26625988 |
Rafael Silva Marconato1, Maria Ines Monteiro2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of life of firefighters and rescue professionals, and characterize their socio-demographic, health, work and lifestyle profile.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26625988 PMCID: PMC4663997 DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.0563.2641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
- Distribution of the study sample and response rate. Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firefighters | 110 | 102 | 71 | 69.6 | 71 firefighters |
| GRAU | 14 | 14 | 14 | 100.0 | 7 doctors and 7 nurses |
| ÁGUIA | 10 | 08 | 05 | 62.5 | 2 nurses and 3 flight crew members |
| Total | 134 | 124 | 90 | 72.6 |
- Distribution of absolute and relative frequencies of the variables socio-demographic, work, lifestyle and health conditions (n=90). Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2014
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| 20 to 29 | 19 | 21.3 | |
| 30 to 39 | 39 | 40.8 | |
| 40 to 49 | 25 | 28.0 | |
| 50 to 60 | 06 | 6.7 | |
| No information | 01 | ||
| Sex | |||
| Female | 03 | 3.3 | |
| Male | 87 | 96.7 | |
| Level of Education | |||
| High school/undergraduate | 51 | 58.0 | |
| Graduated from college/graduate | 37 | 42.1 | |
| No information | 02 | ||
| Perception of health status compared to people of the same age | |||
| Worse/a little worse | 3 | 3.3 | |
| Equal | 14 | 15.6 | |
| Better | 50 | 55.6 | |
| Much better | 23 | 25.6 | |
| Currently studying | |||
| No | 75 | 83.3 | |
| Yes | 15 | 16.7 | |
| Report of pain over the last six months | |||
| No | 62 | 68.9 | |
| Yes | 28 | 31.1 | |
| Report of pain in the last week | |||
| No | 71 | 79.8 | |
| Yes | 18 | 20.2 | |
| No information | 01 | ||
| Has another job | |||
| No | 63 | 71.6 | |
| Yes | 25 | 28.4 | |
| No information | 02 | ||
| Time spent to get to work and back home | |||
| Less than or equal to 2 hours | 64 | 71.9 | |
| More than 2 hours | 25 | 28.1 | |
| No information | 01 | ||
| Job satisfaction | |||
| Dissatisfied/a bit unsatisfied/indifferent | 19 | 21.6 | |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 69 | 78.4 | |
| No information | 02 | ||
| Sleep well on working days | |||
| No | 16 | 17.8 | |
| Yes | 74 | 82.2 | |
| Sleep well on days off | |||
| No | 11 | 12.2 | |
| Yes | 79 | 87.8 | |
| Smokes | |||
| No | 88 | 97.8 | |
| Yes | 02 | 2.2 | |
| Ingests alcohol | |||
| No | 48 | 54.5 | |
| Yes | 40 | 45.5 | |
| No information | 02 | ||
| Body mass index | |||
| Lower than 25 | 24 | 27.3 | |
| Between 25 and 30 | 53 | 60.2 | |
| Over 30 | 11 | 12.5 | |
| No information | 02 | ||
Figure 1- Distribution of the WHOQOL averages by domains and facets, n=90. Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2014
- Association of WHOQOL-BREF domains with the realization of household chores, current study, report of pain over the last six months and in the last week variables. Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological | |||||||||||
| Household chores | 0.0315 | ||||||||||
| No | 17 | 81.1 | 7.5 | 70.8 | 70.8 | 83.3 | 87.5 | 91.7 | |||
| Yes | 71 | 73.5 | 14.0 | 41.7 | 62.5 | 75.0 | 83.3 | 100.0 | |||
| Currently studying | 0.0485 | ||||||||||
| No | 75 | 76.6 | 13.0 | 41.7 | 70.8 | 79.2 | 87.5 | 100.0 | |||
| Yes | 14 | 68.2 | 14.2 | 45.8 | 58.3 | 68.8 | 79.2 | 87.5 | |||
| Physical | |||||||||||
| Pain six months | <0.0001 | ||||||||||
| No | 62 | 79.0 | 8.9 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 80.4 | 85.7 | 92.9 | |||
| Yes | 28 | 64.7 | 15,4 | 35.7 | 51.8 | 67.9 | 75.0 | 92.9 | |||
| Pain week | <0.0001 | ||||||||||
| No | 71 | 78.4 | 10.0 | 50.0 | 71.4 | 82.1 | 85.7 | 92.9 | |||
| Yes | 18 | 59.5 | 13.7 | 35.7 | 50.0 | 62.5 | 71.4 | 78.6 | |||
| Environment | 0.0120 | ||||||||||
| No | 62 | 60.9 | 10.6 | 34.4 | 56.3 | 62.5 | 65.6 | 84.4 | |||
| Yes | 28 | 53.9 | 14.9 | 18.8 | 45.3 | 56.3 | 60.9 | 84.4 | |||
*Standard Deviation †Minimum ‡1st Quartile ||Median ¶3rd Quartile **Maximum ††Mann-Whitney Test
- Association between the WHOQOL-BREF domains and lifestyle variables. Campinas, state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2014
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical | Spearman Coefficient* | 0.3030 | 0.3521 |
| p-value | 0.0043 | 0.0007 | |
| n | 87 | 90 | |
| Psychological | Spearman Coefficient* | 0.1001 | 0.3637 |
| p-value | 0.3591 | 0.0005 | |
| n | 86 | 89 | |
| Social | Spearman Coefficient* | 0.0214 | 0.3373 |
| p-value | 0.8442 | 0.0012 | |
| n | 87 | 90 | |
| Environment | Spearman Coefficient* | 0.1933 | 0.2990 |
| p-value | 0.0729 | 0.0042 | |
| n | 87 | 90 |
*Spearman's rank correlation coefficient