Literature DB >> 26625903

Size and characteristics of the biomedical research workforce associated with U.S. National Institutes of Health extramural grants.

Lindsay R Pool1, Robin M Wagner2, Lindsey L Scott1, Deepshikha RoyChowdhury1, Rediet Berhane1, Charles Wu1, Katrina Pearson1, Jennifer A Sutton1, Walter T Schaffer1.   

Abstract

The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) annually invests approximately $22 billion in biomedical research through its extramural grant programs. Since fiscal year (FY) 2010, all persons involved in research during the previous project year have been required to be listed on the annual grant progress report. These new data have enabled the production of the first-ever census of the NIH-funded extramural research workforce. Data were extracted from All Personnel Reports submitted for NIH grants funded in FY 2009, including position title, months of effort, academic degrees obtained, and personal identifiers. Data were de-duplicated to determine a unique person count. Person-years of effort (PYE) on NIH grants were computed. In FY 2009, NIH funded 50,885 grant projects, which created 313,049 full- and part-time positions spanning all job functions involved in biomedical research. These positions were staffed by 247,457 people at 2,604 institutions. These persons devoted 121,465 PYE to NIH grant-supported research. Research project grants each supported 6 full- or part-time positions, on average. Over 20% of positions were occupied by postdoctoral researchers and graduate and undergraduate students. These baseline data were used to project workforce estimates for FYs 2010-2014 and will serve as a foundation for future research. © FASEB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  career stage; educational attainment; occupation; personnel age distribution; researcher census

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26625903      PMCID: PMC4750411          DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-264358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  4 in total

1.  Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael S Teitelbaum
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Research funding. Science funding and short-term economic activity.

Authors:  Bruce A Weinberg; Jason Owen-Smith; Rebecca F Rosen; Lou Schwarz; Barbara McFadden Allen; Roy E Weiss; Julia Lane
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A call for transparency in tracking student and postdoc career outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica K Polka; Kristin A Krukenberg; Gary S McDowell
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.138

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research.

Authors:  Michael Levitt; Jonathan M Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Opinion: Expansion fever and soft money plague the biomedical research enterprise.

Authors:  Henry R Bourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Relationship Between OREF Grants and Future NIH Funding Success.

Authors:  Vishal Hegde; Daniel Johansen; Howard Y Park; Stephen D Zoller; Christopher Hamad; Nicholas M Bernthal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  Increasing Research Productivity in Undergraduate Research Experiences: Exploring Predictors of Collaborative Faculty-Student Publications.

Authors:  Danielle X Morales; Sara E Grineski; Timothy W Collins
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?

Authors:  Andrew D Nordin; William Z Rymer; Andrew A Biewener; Andrew B Schwartz; Daofen Chen; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.