Literature DB >> 2662551

Should results of ultrasound Doppler studies be reported in units of frequency or velocity?

D J Phillips1, K W Beach, J Primozich, D E Strandness.   

Abstract

There is a current tendency to report the results of ultrasound Doppler studies in units of velocity instead of Doppler frequency. This is probably motivated by the intuitive feeling that blood flow studies should naturally be reported in cm/s and the notion that "velocity" is a normalizing factor for Doppler ultrasound studies. In order to determine velocity, the Doppler angle theta or angle formed by the ultrasound beam and flow velocity vector, must be known. It is not possible, using currently available systems, to obtain an accurate estimate of this angle. The physics related to the Doppler equation are reviewed in this paper along with examples to illustrate the origin and magnitude of errors that could arise when reporting in units of velocity. Guidelines are provided for thinking about and reporting results of Doppler studies in units of velocity. An understanding of the Doppler equation and its use in clinical studies are promoted in this paper to enhance the diagnostic usefulness of Doppler ultrasound studies and to reduce serious errors which could lead to faulty information dictating patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662551     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90065-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  2 in total

Review 1.  Doppler velocity measurements from large and small arteries of mice.

Authors:  Craig J Hartley; Anilkumar K Reddy; Sridhar Madala; Mark L Entman; Lloyd H Michael; George E Taffet
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Simulation of platelet, thrombus and erythrocyte hydrodynamic interactions in a 3D arteriole with in vivo comparison.

Authors:  Weiwei Wang; Thomas G Diacovo; Jianchun Chen; Jonathan B Freund; Michael R King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.