Edward El Rassi1, Jess C Mace1, Toby O Steele2, Jeremiah A Alt3, Zachary M Soler4, Rongwei Fu5, Timothy L Smith1. 1. Division of Rhinology and Sinus/Skull Base Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rhinology-Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Program, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology & Sinus Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 5. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) is an abbreviated version of the Smell Identification Test (SIT) used to assess olfactory function. Although the BSIT can be efficiently administered in under 5 minutes, the accuracy of the BSIT in relation to the SIT in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is unknown. METHODS: Patients with CRS were recruited as part of an ongoing multi-institutional observational cohort study. A total of 183 participants provided both BSIT and SIT olfactory function scores during initial enrollment. Linear associations between BSIT and SIT scores were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficients (rp ). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BSIT scores were determined using SIT scores as the "gold standard." RESULTS: A strong bivariate linear association was found between BSIT and SIT scores (rp = 0.893; p < 0.001) for all participants. A significantly lower proportion of patients were identified as having abnormal olfaction using the BSIT compared to the SIT (47% vs 68%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using the currently defined score of ≤8 as a cut-point for abnormal olfactory function, the BSIT demonstrated a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 88% with an overall accuracy of 71%. Increasing the cut-point to ≤9 resulted in an increased sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 76%, and an improved overall accuracy of 83%. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRS, BSIT scores strongly correlate with SIT scores; however, the BSIT underestimates olfactory dysfunction as defined by the suggested cut-point of ≤8. Increasing the cut-point to ≤9 increased the sensitivity and accuracy of the BSIT.
BACKGROUND: The Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) is an abbreviated version of the Smell Identification Test (SIT) used to assess olfactory function. Although the BSIT can be efficiently administered in under 5 minutes, the accuracy of the BSIT in relation to the SIT in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is unknown. METHODS:Patients with CRS were recruited as part of an ongoing multi-institutional observational cohort study. A total of 183 participants provided both BSIT and SIT olfactory function scores during initial enrollment. Linear associations between BSIT and SIT scores were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficients (rp ). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BSIT scores were determined using SIT scores as the "gold standard." RESULTS: A strong bivariate linear association was found between BSIT and SIT scores (rp = 0.893; p < 0.001) for all participants. A significantly lower proportion of patients were identified as having abnormal olfaction using the BSIT compared to the SIT (47% vs 68%, respectively; p < 0.001). Using the currently defined score of ≤8 as a cut-point for abnormal olfactory function, the BSIT demonstrated a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 88% with an overall accuracy of 71%. Increasing the cut-point to ≤9 resulted in an increased sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 76%, and an improved overall accuracy of 83%. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRS, BSIT scores strongly correlate with SIT scores; however, the BSIT underestimates olfactory dysfunction as defined by the suggested cut-point of ≤8. Increasing the cut-point to ≤9 increased the sensitivity and accuracy of the BSIT.
Authors: P J Moberg; R L Doty; R N Mahr; R I Mesholam; S E Arnold; B I Turetsky; R E Gur Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 1997 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah A Alt; Zachary M Soler; Richard R Orlandi; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Jeremiah A Alt; Rodney J Schlosser; Timothy L Smith; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Wytske J Fokkens; Valerie J Lund; Joachim Mullol; Claus Bachert; Isam Alobid; Fuad Baroody; Noam Cohen; Anders Cervin; Richard Douglas; Philippe Gevaert; Christos Georgalas; Herman Goossens; Richard Harvey; Peter Hellings; Claire Hopkins; Nick Jones; Guy Joos; Livije Kalogjera; Bob Kern; Marek Kowalski; David Price; Herbert Riechelmann; Rodney Schlosser; Brent Senior; Mike Thomas; Elina Toskala; Richard Voegels; De Yun Wang; Peter John Wormald Journal: Rhinology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Jess C Mace; Zachary M Soler Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Daniel M Beswick; Jess C Mace; Naweed I Chowdhury; Jeremiah A Alt; Peter H Hwang; Adam S DeConde; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Joshua M Levy; Jess C Mace; Todd E Bodner; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Kennedy D Mahdavi; Sheldon E Jordan; Hannah R Barrows; Maša Pravdic; Barshen Habelhah; Natalie E Evans; Robin B Blades; Jessica J Iovine; Sergio A Becerra; Rachel A Steiner; Marisa Chang; Santosh Kesari; Alexander Bystritsky; Ed O'Connor; Hyman Gross; F Scott Pereles; Mike Whitney; Taylor Kuhn Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2021-06
Authors: N R Rowan; Z M Soler; J C Mace; M P Camilon; C Palmer; R H Jones; T L Smith; R J Schlosser Journal: Rhinology Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Joshua M Levy; Jess C Mace; E Ritter Sansoni; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Nyssa F Farrell; Jess C Mace; David A Sauer; Andrew J Thomas; Mathew Geltzeiler; Kara Y Detwiller; Timothy L Smith Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 2.467