P A Leake1, P O Roberts2, K Pitzul3, J M Plummer2. 1. Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica, West Indies. paeleake@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica. 3. Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) reduces hospital stay and complications during the waiting period. The purpose of this study is to establish the patterns of management of ACC at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) and to evaluate the advantages of early versus delayed cholecystectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of ACC. Data collection included demographics, management strategy, timing to cholecystectomy, significant events while awaiting cholecystectomy and duration of hospital stay. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests were used for analysis. P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 102 patient charts were extracted, 59 of which were managed conservatively and 43 managed with early cholecystectomy. The mean time to surgery after conservative management was 173 days. About 30% of persons managed conservatively had significant attacks while awaiting surgery, which included need for re-admission and earlier intervention. There was a trend toward longer mean total hospital stay in the conservative group (xsx = 5.03, xCons = 6.12; p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Conservative management of ACC results in significant delays in definitive management and risks of complications during the waiting period. Early cholecystectomy should be encouraged even in a resource-restricted setting.
BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) reduces hospital stay and complications during the waiting period. The purpose of this study is to establish the patterns of management of ACC at the University Hospital of the West Indies (UHWI) and to evaluate the advantages of early versus delayed cholecystectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted with a diagnosis of ACC. Data collection included demographics, management strategy, timing to cholecystectomy, significant events while awaiting cholecystectomy and duration of hospital stay. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-squared tests were used for analysis. P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 102 patient charts were extracted, 59 of which were managed conservatively and 43 managed with early cholecystectomy. The mean time to surgery after conservative management was 173 days. About 30% of persons managed conservatively had significant attacks while awaiting surgery, which included need for re-admission and earlier intervention. There was a trend toward longer mean total hospital stay in the conservative group (xsx = 5.03, xCons = 6.12; p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: Conservative management of ACC results in significant delays in definitive management and risks of complications during the waiting period. Early cholecystectomy should be encouraged even in a resource-restricted setting.