Literature DB >> 26624559

Similar Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients with Normodynamic and Hyperdynamic Septic Shock.

Vanina S Kanoore Edul1,2, Can Ince2, Alejandro Risso Vazquez3, Paolo N Rubatto3, Emilio D Valenzuela Espinoza3, Sebastián Welsh3, Carolina Enrico3, Arnaldo Dubin3,4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: In normodynamic septic shock, the quantitative assessment of sublingual microcirculation has shown decreases in perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity. However, no studies have been performed in hyperdynamic septic shock.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the microcirculatory patterns and rule out the presence of fast red blood cell velocity in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the sublingual microcirculation in healthy volunteers (n = 20) and in patients with hyperdynamic (n = 20) and normodynamic (n = 20) septic shock. Hyperdynamic septic shock was defined by a cardiac index >4.0 L/min/m(2). The microcirculation was assessed with sidestream dark field imaging and AVA 3.0 software.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences in perfused vascular density, proportion of perfused vessels, or microvascular flow index between patients with hyperdynamic and normodynamic septic shock, but these variables were reduced compared with those of healthy volunteers, A similar pattern was observed in red blood cell velocity (912 ± 291, 968 ± 204, and 1303 ± 120 μm/s, respectively; P < 0.0001) and its coefficient of variation. In both types of septic shock, no microvessel had a red blood cell velocity higher than the 100th percentile value for healthy volunteers.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hyperdynamic septic shock showed microcirculatory alterations similar to those of patients with normal cardiac output. Both groups of patients had reduced perfused vascular density and red blood cell velocity and increased flow heterogeneity compared with that of healthy subjects. Fast red blood cell velocity was not found, even in patients with high cardiac output. These results support the conclusion that microcirculatory function is frequently dissociated from systemic hemodynamic derangements in septic shock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microvessels; resuscitation; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26624559     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-606OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of Hemolysis During Sepsis.

Authors:  Katharina Effenberger-Neidnicht; Matthias Hartmann
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.092

2.  Comparison of the oral and rectal mucosal and colonic serosal microcirculations of healthy, anesthetized horses.

Authors:  Philip J Kieffer; Jarred M Williams; Molly K Shepard; Steeve Giguère; Kira L Epstein
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 3.  Interpretation of venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in the resuscitation of septic shock patients.

Authors:  Siyi Yuan; Huaiwu He; Yun Long
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Philip-Helge Arnemann; Michael Hessler; Tim Kampmeier; Andrea Morelli; Hugo Karel Van Aken; Martin Westphal; Sebastian Rehberg; Christian Ertmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2016-11-18

5.  Shedding light on venoarterial PCO2 gradient.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Mario Omar Pozo
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  Monitoring Microcirculation: Utility and Barriers - A Point-of-View Review.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Vanina Siham Kanoore Edul; Juan Francisco Caminos Eguillor; Gonzalo Ferrara
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Relationship of Effective Circulating Volume with Sublingual Red Blood Cell Velocity and Microvessel Pressure Difference: A Clinical Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Michalis Xenos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: consensus and debate.

Authors:  Olcay Dilken; Bulent Ergin; Can Ince
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.