Literature DB >> 2662437

Comparison of Sheffield media with standard media for the isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi.

K Macdonald1, D W Cameron, G Irungu, L J D'Costa, F A Plummer, L A Slaney, J O Ndinya-Achola, A R Ronald.   

Abstract

Isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi is the only method for the definitive diagnosis of chancroid. Culture on supplemented gonococcal base (GCHgs) or on supplemented Muller-Hinton agar (MHHb) has yielded the best isolation rates. Sheffield media is an alternative to standard media. We compared the isolation rate of H. ducreyi on GCHgs and MHHb to that on the Sheffield media with and without 5% horse blood. Vancomycin (3 mg/L) was added to all media. Of the 87 specimens cultured from patients with genital ulcer disease, 57 (66%) were positive on either GCHgs or MHHb or on both. Twenty six (30%) were positive on GCHgs only, 15 (17%) on MHHb only, and 15 (17%) on both. One culture was positive on Sheffield medium with 5% horse blood; none were positive on Sheffield medium without horse blood. Stock strains showed good growth at 48 hr on GCHgs and MHHb, but no growth at 48 hr and only minimally detectable growth at 72 hr on Sheffield media with horse blood. No growth was detected on Sheffield media without horseblood. Thus optimal culture of H. ducreyi in Kenya requires two media, supplemented gonococcal base and Muller-Hinton agar. Sheffield media is not useful for the primary isolation of H. ducreyi.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662437     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-198904000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  5 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory techniques in the investigation of chancroid, lymphogranuloma venereum and donovanosis.

Authors:  E Van Dyck; P Piot
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1992-04

2.  Regulation of expression of the Haemophilus ducreyi LspB and LspA2 proteins by CpxR.

Authors:  Maria Labandeira-Rey; Jason R Mock; Eric J Hansen
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update.

Authors:  D L Trees; S A Morse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Development of a rapid immunodiagnostic test for Haemophilus ducreyi.

Authors:  Kristine Patterson; Bonnie Olsen; Christopher Thomas; Dora Norn; Milton Tam; Christopher Elkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A simple medium for the primary isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi.

Authors:  Y Dangor; S D Miller; H J Koornhof; R C Ballard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.