Literature DB >> 26623107

Establishment of a mathematic model for predicting malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules.

Man Zhang1, Na Zhuo1, Zhanlin Guo1, Xingguang Zhang1, Wenhua Liang1, Sheng Zhao1, Jianxing He1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish a model for predicting the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and provide guidance for the diagnosis and follow-up intervention of SPNs.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and computed tomography (CT) images of 294 patients with a clear pathological diagnosis of SPN. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent predictors of the probability of malignancy in the SPN and to establish a model for predicting malignancy in SPNs. Then, another 120 SPN patients who did not participate in the model establishment were chosen as group B and used to verify the accuracy of the prediction model.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, smoking history, maximum diameter of nodules, spiculation, clear borders, and Cyfra21-1 levels between subgroups with benign and malignant SPNs (P<0.05). These factors were identified as independent predictors of malignancy in SPNs. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.910 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.857-0.963] in model with Cyfra21-1 significantly better than 0.812 (95% CI, 0.763-0.861) in model without Cyfra21-1 (P=0.008). The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of our model is significantly higher than the Mayo model, VA model and Peking University People's (PKUPH) model. Our model (AUC =0.910) compared with Brock model (AUC =0.878, P=0.350), the difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The model added Cyfra21-1 could improve prediction. The prediction model established in this study can be used to assess the probability of malignancy in SPNs, thereby providing help for the diagnosis of SPNs and the selection of follow-up interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN); diagnosis; logistic model; malignant tumor; prediction

Year:  2015        PMID: 26623107      PMCID: PMC4635307          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  24 in total

1.  Clinical observations on the association between diagnosis of lung cancer and serum tumor markers in combination.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Wang; Zhen Tao; Wei Gu; Li-Hua Sun
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

2.  An evaluation of the tumour markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin marker (CYFRA 21-1) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the differentiation of malignant from benign solitary pulmonary lesions.

Authors:  M D Seemann; T Beinert; H Fürst; U Fink
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 3.  [CYFRA21-1].

Authors:  Satoshi Kitamura
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2005-08

4.  Development and validation of a clinical prediction model to estimate the probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules in Chinese people.

Authors:  Yun Li; Ke-Zhong Chen; Jun Wang
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Diagnostic values of SCC, CEA, Cyfra21-1 and NSE for lung cancer in patients with suspicious pulmonary masses: a single center analysis.

Authors:  Xiang-Yang Chu; Xiao-Bin Hou; Wei-An Song; Zhi-Qiang Xue; Bo Wang; Lian-Bin Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Sarah DeMello; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Brenda Brewer; Timothy R Church; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine A Gatsonis; David S Gierada; Amanda Jain; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; Joshua M Rathmell; JoRean Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules.

Authors:  S J Swensen; M D Silverstein; D M Ilstrup; C D Schleck; E S Edell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-04-28

8.  The efficacy of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels in determining the malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  T T Bekci; T Senol; E Maden
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Size of solitary pulmonary nodule was the risk factor of malignancy.

Authors:  Chang-Zheng Shi; Qian Zhao; Liang-Ping Luo; Jian-Xing He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Solitary pulmonary nodule: A diagnostic algorithm in the light of current imaging technique.

Authors:  Ali Nawaz Khan; Hamdan H Al-Jahdali; Klaus L Irion; Mohammad Arabi; Shyam Sunder Koteyar
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2011-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  Comparison Between Radiological Semantic Features and Lung-RADS in Predicting Malignancy of Screen-Detected Lung Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Qian Li; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Ying Liu; Jin Qi; Matthew B Schabath; Zhaoxiang Ye; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Integration of PET/CT Radiomics and Semantic Features for Differentiation between Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Dongyang Du; Jiamei Gu; Xiaohui Chen; Wenbing Lv; Qianjin Feng; Arman Rahmim; Hubing Wu; Lijun Lu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Establishment and validation of a mathematical diagnosis model to distinguish benign pulmonary nodules from early non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese people.

Authors:  Qiang Wei; Weizhen Fang; Xi Chen; Zhongzhen Yuan; Yumei Du; Yanbin Chang; Yonghong Wang; Shulin Chen
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10

4.  Applying Risk Prediction Models to Optimize Lung Cancer Screening: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lori C Sakoda; Louise M Henderson; Tanner J Caverly; Karen J Wernli; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-24

5.  Differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules with dual-source spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Zhitao Shi; Yanhui Wang; Xueqi He
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  [Advances and Clinical Application of Malignant Probability Prediction Models for 
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule].

Authors:  Zhaojue Wang; Jing Zhao; Mengzhao Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 7.  Lung cancer risk prediction models based on pulmonary nodules: A systematic review.

Authors:  Zheng Wu; Fei Wang; Wei Cao; Chao Qin; Xuesi Dong; Zhuoyu Yang; Yadi Zheng; Zilin Luo; Liang Zhao; Yiwen Yu; Yongjie Xu; Jiang Li; Wei Tang; Sipeng Shen; Ning Wu; Fengwei Tan; Ni Li; Jie He
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Logistic and Machine Learning-Based Models for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Zihan Wei; Yuntao Nie; Haifeng Shen; Xin Wang; Jun Wang; Fan Yang; Kezhong Chen
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-02-22

9.  Solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy predictive models applicable to routine clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marina Senent-Valero; Julián Librero; María Pastor-Valero
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-06

10.  Predictive model for the diagnosis of benign/malignant small pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Weisong Chen; Dan Zhu; Hui Chen; Jianfeng Luo; Haiwei Fu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.