Literature DB >> 26623099

Pharmacological treatment response according to the severity of symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Jae Seung Lee1, Joon Beom Seo1, Sang Min Lee1, Tai Sun Park1, Sei Won Lee1, Yeon-Mok Oh1, Ji-Hyun Lee1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Tae-Hyung Kim1, Joo Hun Park1, Seung Soo Sheen1, Seong Yong Lim1, Ina Jung1, Sang-Do Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is recommended according to the individualized assessment of symptoms and exacerbation risks. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the baseline Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score and pharmacological treatment response in patients with COPD.
METHODS: A total of 102 stable COPD patients who were enrolled in prospective cohort studies were analyzed. Pharmacological treatment responses after a 3-month treatment were assessed by changes on the mMRC dyspnea scale, CAT scores, and spirometric pulmonary functions.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with a mMRC dyspnea scale ≤1 were classified as having "less dyspnea" and 40 patients with a mMRC dyspnea scale ≥2 as having "more dyspnea". After a 3-month treatment, the mean mMRC dyspnea scale in the "more dyspnea" group was significantly decreased versus the "less dyspnea" group; however, there were no significant differences in CAT score changes or spirometric pulmonary function changes between the two groups. Baseline mMRC scales (Spearman's rho =-0.591, P<0.001) and baseline CAT scores (Pearson's r =-0.337, P=0.001) were significantly correlated with their changes after a 3-month treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that baseline mMRC scale and CAT score were the only independent predictors of improvement greater than a minimal clinically significant difference after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of COPD symptoms is associated with their response to pharmacotherapy. COPD patients with a higher baseline mMRC dyspnea scale and CAT score experience greater symptom reduction by pharmacotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); dyspnea; pharmacotherapy; quality of life (QoL); symptoms

Year:  2015        PMID: 26623099      PMCID: PMC4635274          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  27 in total

Review 1.  Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P W Jones
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Gender and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: why it matters.

Authors:  Meilan K Han; Dirkje Postma; David M Mannino; Nicholas D Giardino; Sonia Buist; Jeffrey L Curtis; Fernando J Martinez
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study.

Authors:  P W Jones; G Brusselle; R W Dal Negro; M Ferrer; P Kardos; M L Levy; T Perez; J J Soler Cataluña; T van der Molen; L Adamek; N Banik
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  A comparison of the assessment of quality of life with CAT, CCQ, and SGRQ in COPD patients participating in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  Thomas Ringbaek; Gerd Martinez; Peter Lange
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate by GOLD stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis from the randomised, placebo-controlled TORCH study.

Authors:  Christine R Jenkins; Paul W Jones; Peter M A Calverley; Bartolome Celli; Julie A Anderson; Gary T Ferguson; Julie C Yates; Lisa R Willits; Jörgen Vestbo
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2009-06-30

6.  A factor analysis of dyspnea ratings, respiratory muscle strength, and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  D A Mahler; A Harver
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1992-02

7.  Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Samantha S C Kon; Jane L Canavan; Sarah E Jones; Claire M Nolan; Amy L Clark; Mandy J Dickson; Brigitte M Haselden; Michael I Polkey; William D-C Man
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 30.700

8.  Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test.

Authors:  P W Jones; G Harding; P Berry; I Wiklund; W-H Chen; N Kline Leidy
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: a cross-sectional analyses.

Authors:  Sunmin Kim; Jisun Oh; Yu-Il Kim; Hee-Jung Ban; Yong-Soo Kwon; In-Jae Oh; Kyu-Sik Kim; Young-Chul Kim; Sung-Chul Lim
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.317

10.  A Validation Study for the Korean Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT).

Authors:  Yong Il Hwang; Ki-Suck Jung; Seong-Yong Lim; Yil-Seob Lee; Nam-Hee Kwon
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2013-06-25
View more
  2 in total

1.  Differences in Pulmonary and Extra-Pulmonary Traits between Women and Men with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Sara Souto-Miranda; Alex J van 't Hul; Anouk W Vaes; Jeanine C Antons; Remco S Djamin; Daisy J A Janssen; Frits M E Franssen; Alda Marques; Martijn A Spruit
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Is Inhaler Technique Associated with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

Authors:  Shahideh Amini; Arezou Ghasemi; Mohammad Solduzian; Besharat Rahimi; Kazem Heidari; Molouk Hadjibabaie; Mona Kargar
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2020-10-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.