Literature DB >> 26622462

Differences in 23S ribosomal RNA mutations between wild-type and mutant macrolide-resistant Chlamydia trachomatis isolates.

Yong Jiang1, Hui Zhu1, Li-Na Yang1, Yuan-Jun Liu2, Shu-Ping Hou2, Man-Li Qi2, Quan-Zhong Liu2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro susceptibility of wild-type and mutant clinical isolates of Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis strains to erythromycin, azithromycin and josamycin, and to identify the resistance-conferring 23S ribosomal (r)RNA mutations in the isolates. The wild-type resistant isolates were defined as those with minimum inhibitory concentration values above the tissue concentration of the antibiotic in the urogenital system. Furthermore, all resistant C. trachomatis isolates were exposed to sub-inhibitory concentrations of macrolides, and 13 resistant mutants were selected following serial passages. Among the 8 wild-type isolates that were resistant to erythromycin, 3 isolates had a mutation at T2611C in the 23S rRNA gene while the others did not show any 23S rRNA mutations. The selected mutant isolates showed a 4- to 16-fold reduction in in vitro sensitivities. With regard to the mutant strains, the T2611C mutation was found in 10 isolates, A2057G mutation in 6 isolates, and A2059G mutation in 1 isolate. Thus, the macrolide-resistant isolates of the wild-type strain had different mutations from those selected by exposure to sub-inhibitory concentrations of macrolides. Also, since 23S rRNA mutations were not identified in certain isolates, it was considered that other molecular mechanisms may also be responsible for the macrolide resistance of C. trachomatis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  23S rRNA; Chlamydia trachomatis; macrolide; point mutation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26622462      PMCID: PMC4533178          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  17 in total

Review 1.  Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro susceptibility of recent clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis to macrolides and tetracyclines.

Authors:  Z Samra; S Rosenberg; Y Soffer; M Dan
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Mutations in a 23S rRNA gene of Chlamydia trachomatis associated with resistance to macrolides.

Authors:  O Y Misyurina; E V Chipitsyna; Y P Finashutina; V N Lazarev; T A Akopian; A M Savicheva; V M Govorun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The case for further treatment studies of uncomplicated genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  P Horner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Stuart M Berman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-08-04

Review 6.  Therapeutic approaches to Chlamydia infections.

Authors:  Laurence Senn; Margaret R Hammerschlag; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.889

7.  Antibiotic resistance mutations in 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C D Sigmund; M Ettayebi; E A Morgan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-06-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Identification of two erythromycin resistance mutations in the mitochondrial gene coding for the large ribosomal RNA in yeast.

Authors:  F Sor; H Fukuhara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  In vitro stepwise selection of resistance to quinolones, beta-lactams and amikacin in nosocomial gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M Michéa-Hamzehpour; A Kahr; J C Pechère
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp.

Authors:  R J Suchland; W M Geisler; Walter E Stamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comprehensive global genome dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis show ancient diversification followed by contemporary mixing and recent lineage expansion.

Authors:  James Hadfield; Simon R Harris; Helena M B Seth-Smith; Surendra Parmar; Patiyan Andersson; Philip M Giffard; Julius Schachter; Jeanne Moncada; Louise Ellison; María Lucía Gallo Vaulet; Marcelo Rodríguez Fermepin; Frans Radebe; Suyapa Mendoza; Sander Ouburg; Servaas A Morré; Konrad Sachse; Mirja Puolakkainen; Suvi J Korhonen; Chris Sonnex; Rebecca Wiggins; Hamid Jalal; Tamara Brunelli; Patrizia Casprini; Rachel Pitt; Cathy Ison; Alevtina Savicheva; Elena Shipitsyna; Ronza Hadad; Laszlo Kari; Matthew J Burton; David Mabey; Anthony W Solomon; David Lewis; Peter Marsh; Magnus Unemo; Ian N Clarke; Julian Parkhill; Nicholas R Thomson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Direct assessment of possible mutations in the 23S rRNA gene encoding macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J M van Niekerk; I H M van Loo; M Lucchesi; S A Morré; C J P A Hoebe; N H T M Dukers-Muijrers; P F G Wolffs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  An overview of genes and mutations associated with Chlamydiae species' resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  Ahmed Moussa; Fouzia Radouani; Ichrak Benamri; Maryame Azzouzi; Kholoud Sanak
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.944

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.