Literature DB >> 26622371

Evaluation of discomfort and tolerability to bronchoscopy according to different sedation procedures with midazolam.

Takeshi Matsumoto1, Kojiro Otsuka1, Ryoji Kato1, Ryoko Shimizu1, Takehiro Otoshi1, Daichi Fujimoto1, Takahisa Kawamura1, Koji Tamai1, Kazuma Nagata1, Kyoko Otsuka1, Atsushi Nakagawa1, Keisuke Tomii1.   

Abstract

Patients frequently experience great discomfort during a bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of lung neoplasms. Sedation is generally recommended during bronchoscopy; however, few studies have evaluated the discomfort and tolerability of patients to a bronchoscopy with regard to the administration procedures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the discomfort and tolerability of patients undergoing a bronchoscopy using different sedation procedures with midazolam. The retrospective survey of sedation during bronchoscopy involved the comparison of two periods: January-March 2012 (first period) and July-September 2012 (second period). A numerical rating score, which ranged between 1 (best) and 5 (worst) according to the subjective view of the patients, was used to rate patient discomfort, pain, sensation, time and tolerability to the bronchoscopy. In the first period, 2.5 mg midazolam was administered prior to the initiation of surgery, and additional doses of midazolam was added in 2.5-mg increments whenever the patient deviated from the target sedation level. In the second period, 2.0 or 3.0 mg midazolam was administered prior to the initiation of surgery, and additional midazolam doses were administered in 1.0-mg increments until the patients were sedated to the target sedation level. In total, 60 and 68 valid responses were obtained in the first and second periods, respectively. The patients in the second period exhibited significantly improved discomfort and pain scores during the bronchoscopy and higher rates of consent to re-examination, as compared with the patients in the first period (1.89±1.40 vs. 2.78±1.52, P<0.001; 1.48±1.13 vs. 2.00±1.37, P=0.005; 2.45±1.62 vs. 3.13±1.47, P=0.013, respectively). The amount of midazolam administered was significantly higher in the second period. There were no fatal complications during the bronchoscopy in either period. In conclusion, the present study observed that the administration of additional midazolam in small doses, until the target sedation level is achieved, is a safe procedure that is associated with significantly less discomfort and pain during bronchoscopy and a greater consent to re-examination when compared with the administration of a fixed dose of midazolam.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bronchoscopy; discomfort; midazolam; sedation; tolerability

Year:  2015        PMID: 26622371      PMCID: PMC4508987          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2015.2547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  13 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE.

Authors:  I A Du Rand; J Blaikley; R Booton; N Chaudhuri; V Gupta; S Khalid; S Mandal; J Martin; J Mills; N Navani; N M Rahman; J M Wrightson; M Munavvar
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Prospective analysis of efficacy and safety of an individualized-midazolam-dosing protocol for sedation during prolonged bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Tomomi Ogawa; Kazuyoshi Imaizumi; Izumi Hashimoto; Yuichiro Shindo; Naoyuki Imai; Sakurako Uozu; Tomoya Shimokata; Satoru Ito; Naozumi Hashimoto; Mitsuo Sato; Masashi Kondo; Yoshinori Hasegawa
Journal:  Respir Investig       Date:  2013-11-09

3.  Videos in clinical medicine. Conscious sedation for minor procedures in adults.

Authors:  Dean R Jones; Peter Salgo; Joseph Meltzer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Does sedation help in fibreoptic bronchoscopy?

Authors:  M Q Hatton; M B Allen; A S Vathenen; E Mellor; N J Cooke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-11-05

5.  American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the use of topical anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in adult patients.

Authors:  Momen M Wahidi; Prasoon Jain; Michael Jantz; Pyng Lee; G Burkhard Mackensen; Sally Y Barbour; Carla Lamb; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Bronchoscopic practice in Japan: a survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy in 2010.

Authors:  Fumihiro Asano; Motoi Aoe; Yoshinobu Ohsaki; Yoshinori Okada; Shinji Sasada; Shigeki Sato; Eiichi Suzuki; Hiroshi Senba; Shozo Fujino; Kazumitsu Ohmori
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.424

7.  Survey of flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C M Smyth; R J Stead
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  An audit of bronchoscopy practice in the United Kingdom: a survey of adherence to national guidelines.

Authors:  D Honeybourne; C S Neumann
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in patients with pre-existing respiratory failure: Midazolam versus Midazolam plus Alfentanil.

Authors:  Michael Dreher; Emelie Ekkernkamp; Jan Hendrik Storre; Hans-Joachim Kabitz; Wolfram Windisch
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 10.  Sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: current and emerging evidence.

Authors:  Ricardo J José; Shahzad Shaefi; Neal Navani
Journal:  Eur Respir Rev       Date:  2013-06-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of factors during bronchoscopy that affect patient reluctance to undergo repeat examination: Questionnaire analysis after initial bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Kazushi Fujimoto; Tsukasa Ishiwata; Hajime Kasai; Jiro Terada; Yu Shionoya; Jun Ikari; Naoko Kawata; Yuji Tada; Kenji Tsushima; Koichiro Tatsumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Randomized single-blind comparative study of the midazolam/pethidine combination and midazolam alone during bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Masahiro Katsurada; Motoko Tachihara; Naoko Katsurada; Naoya Takata; Hiroki Sato; Chihiro Mimura; Junya Yoshioka; Koichi Furukawa; Masako Yumura; Takehiro Otoshi; Yuichiro Yasuda; Tatsunori Kiriu; Daisuke Hazama; Tatsuya Nagano; Masatsugu Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Nishimura; Kazuyuki Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Pulmonologist-Administered Balanced Propofol Analgosedation during Interventional Procedures: An Italian Real-Life Study on Comfort and Safety.

Authors:  Rosalba Maffucci; Uberto Maccari; Luca Guidelli; Lucia Benedetti; Roberto Fabbroni; Bruno Piccoli; Andrea Bianco; Raffaele Scala
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 4.  The comparison of propofol and midazolam for bronchoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Zhizhen Wang; Zhi Hu; Tianyang Dai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.