Literature DB >> 26622264

Prevalence of intellectual disability in Iran: Toward a new conceptual framework in data collection.

Shahin Soltani1, Bahman Khosravi2, Hamid Salehiniya3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26622264      PMCID: PMC4638077          DOI: 10.4103/1735-1995.166234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Med Sci        ISSN: 1735-1995            Impact factor:   1.852


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Intellectual disability (ID) is characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior that begin before the age of 18 years.[1] Prevalence of ID has been reported around 1-3% population in the world and of these mild, moderate, severe, and profound ID affects about 85%, 10%, 4%, and 2% of the population, respectively.[1234] According to Harris[5] and Maulik et al.[2] studies, the highest prevalence is in low income countries (16.41/1000 population), whereas for middle- and high-income countries is around 15.94 and 9.21/1000 population, respectively. Furthermore, the prevalence of ID is more among child/adolescent population (18.30/1000) in comparison with an adult population (4.94/1000). In this study, data were extracted from the Statistical Center of Iran.[6] According to census results in 2011, the prevalence of ID is around 13/1000 population in Iran. In Figure 1, the prevalence of ID is showed according to age and gender. In general, the prevalence of ID among men (5.3/1000) is more than women (3.5/1000), and it has the highest rate for adolescents and young people.
Figure 1

Prevalence of intellectual disability according to age and gender in Iran (per 1000 population), x-axis: (%), y-axis: age group

Prevalence of intellectual disability according to age and gender in Iran (per 1000 population), x-axis: (%), y-axis: age group The results in comparison to other studies showed that the prevalence of ID in Iran is lower than global estimates significantly. Because of the different definitions of ID and data collection methods, rates are different in Iran as compared with other countries.[7] The study reveals that there is an extensive conceptual and methodological gap in the census method and we should pay more attention to reduce the gap. The International Classification of Functioning disability and health (ICF) is a comprehensive population health measurement framework applied for the scientific standardization of data on health and disability worldwide. ICF makes it possible to collect those vital data in a consistent and internationally comparable manner.[89] In 1998, in order to reach a universally accepted conceptual framework to define and classify disability, World Health Organization (WHO) has developed an instrument entitled the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) that provides a standardized method for measuring health and disability across cultures. WHODAS 2.0 has been developed specifically to reflect key features of the ICF.[10] The instrument has been used in many countries and it should be valid in Iran for increasing data quality in surveys and censuses.[11] In conclusion, using the conceptual framework of ICF in censuses and national health surveys is important and essential in Iran. ICF - based prevalence can provide comparable data at the national and global level for health and social policy development and monitoring, health and disability-related legislation, and service provision and development of disability research.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  6 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of mental retardation: challenges and opportunities in the new millennium.

Authors:  Helen Leonard; Xingyan Wen
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies.

Authors:  Pallab K Maulik; Maya N Mascarenhas; Colin D Mathers; Tarun Dua; Shekhar Saxena
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-01-13

3.  Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.

Authors:  Tzu-Ying Chiu; Chia-Feng Yen; Cheng-Hsiu Chou; Jin-Ding Lin; Ai-Wen Hwang; Hua-Fang Liao; Wen-Chou Chi
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-08-03

Review 4.  Genomics, intellectual disability, and autism.

Authors:  Heather C Mefford; Mark L Batshaw; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Olatz Garin; Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Josué Almansa; Marta Nieto; Somnath Chatterji; Gemma Vilagut; Jordi Alonso; Alarcos Cieza; Olga Svetskova; Helena Burger; Vittorio Racca; Carlo Francescutti; Eduard Vieta; Nenad Kostanjsek; Alberto Raggi; Matilde Leonardi; Montse Ferrer
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Use of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems.

Authors:  Nenad Kostanjsek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Demographic, clinical and forensic characteristics of alleged offenders referred to West End Specialised Hospital, Kimberley, South Africa.

Authors:  Nathaniel Lehlohonolo Mosotho; Mpho Lesego Bantobetse; Gina Joubert; Helene Engela le Roux
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-05-05

2.  What we should know about health problems in people with intellectual disability: Implications for health policy.

Authors:  Shahin Soltani; Ahmad Faramarzi; Bahman Khosravi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Different Types of Disabilities in Iran.

Authors:  Ghobad Moradi; Farideh Mostafavi; Mohammad Hajizadeh; Mohammad Amerzade; Amjad Mohammadi Bolbanabad; Cyrus Alinia; Bakhtiar Piroozi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Parental Experiences about the Sexual and Reproductive Health of Adolescent Girls with Intellectual Disability: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Shadi Goli; Mahnaz Noroozi; Mehrdad Salehi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

5.  Financial Barriers to Access to Health Services for Adult People with Disability in Iran: The Challenges for Universal Health Coverage.

Authors:  Shahin Soltani; Amirhossein Takian; Ali Akbari Sari; Reza Majdzadeh; Mohammad Kamali
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Caregiver Burden and Its Associated Factors in Caregivers of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Conditions.

Authors:  Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery; Bahareh Ahmadi
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-10

7.  Complications in Diagnosis of Susceptible Cases of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Reza Jafarzadeh Esfehani; Mahtab Dastpak; Mohammad Reza Mirinezhad; Ariane Sadr-Nabavi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.429

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.