Literature DB >> 26622016

The FGM enhanced dataset: how are we going to discuss this with our patients?

Sharon Dixon1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26622016      PMCID： PMC4655716          DOI： 10.3399/bjgp15X687781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Mandatory submission of patient identifiable information to third parties: FGM now, what next?

Authors:  Susan Bewley; Brenda Kelly; Katrina Darke; Katrina Erskine; Clare Gerada; Patricia Lohr; Paquita de Zulueta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Mandatory reporting of female genital mutilation by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Nigel Mathers; Janice Rymer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.386
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Supporting patients with female genital mutilation in primary care: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of GPs' working in England.

Authors:  Sharon Dixon; Lisa Hinton; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Female genital mutilation in the UK- where are we, where do we go next? Involving communities in setting the research agenda.

Authors:  S Dixon; K Agha; F Ali; L El-Hindi; B Kelly; L Locock; N Otoo-Oyortey; S Penny; E Plugge; L Hinton
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-09-17

Review 3.  Conversations about FGM in primary care: a realist review on how, why and under what circumstances FGM is discussed in general practice consultations.

Authors:  Sharon Dixon; Claire Duddy; Gabrielle Harrison; Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Sue Ziebland; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.