Literature DB >> 26621700

Identifying and defining complications of dermatologic surgery to be tracked in the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS) Registry.

M Laurin Council1, Murad Alam2, Hugh M Gloster3, Jeremy S Bordeaux4, Bryan T Carroll5, Justin J Leitenberger6, Oliver J Wisco7, Ian A Maher8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, increasing emphasis has been placed on value-based health care delivery. Dermatology must develop performance measures to judge the quality of services provided. The implementation of a national complication registry is one such method of tracking surgical outcomes and monitoring the safety of the specialty.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define critical outcome measures to be included in the complications registry of the American College of Mohs Surgery (ACMS).
METHODS: A Delphi process was used to reach consensus on the complications to be recorded.
RESULTS: Four major and one minor complications were selected: death, bleeding requiring additional intervention, functional loss attributable to surgery, hospitalization for an operative complication, and surgical site infection. LIMITATIONS: This article addresses only one aspect of registry development: identifying and defining surgical complications.
CONCLUSION: The ACMS Registry aims to gather data to monitor the safety and value of dermatologic surgery. Determining and defining the outcomes to be included in the registry is an important foundation toward this endeavor.
Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Mohs Surgery; Mohs; complications; dermatologic surgery; outcome measures; registry; value-based health care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621700     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  6 in total

1.  Physician-Centered Outcomes for Skin Cancer Treatment: A Single-Day Modified Delphi Process to Assess the Importance of Themes in Skin Cancer Management.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Joseph Sobanko; Naomi Lawrence; Jeremy Bordeaux; Todd Cartee; Eric S Armbrecht; Anit Behera; Christian L Baum; Murad Alam; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Association of Different Surgical Sterile Prep Solutions With Infection Risk After Cutaneous Surgery of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Murad Alam; Joel L Cohen; Brian Petersen; Daniel I Schlessinger; Alexandra Weil; Sanjana Iyengar; Emily Poon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Process of Post-operative Telephone Follow-up Implementation for Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Brayden Forbes; Aaron M Secrest; Matthew Q Hand; Mark J Eliason
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2018-07-01

4.  Evaluating Surgeon-Specific Performance for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Yuan Xu; Jeremiah A Alt; Adam Deconde; Timothy L Smith; Rodney J Schlosser; Hude Quan; Zachary M Soler
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Patient-Centered Outcomes for Skin Cancer Management: Utilization of a Patient Delphi Process to Identify Important Treatment Themes.

Authors:  Todd V Cartee; Murad Alam; Eric S Armbrecht; Anit Behera; Naomi Lawrence; Jeremy S Bordeaux; Christian L Baum; Anthony Rossi; Ian A Maher
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 6.  Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns.

Authors:  Allen G Strickler; Payal Shah; Shirin Bajaj; Richard Mizuguchi; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Mercy Odueyungbo; Anthony Rossi; Désirée Ratner
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 15.487

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.