Literature DB >> 26621421

The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.

Victor Chang1,2, Jason M Schwalb1,3,2, David R Nerenz1,3,2, Lisa Pietrantoni1,2, Sharon Jones1,2, Michelle Jankowski4,2, Nancy Oja-Tebbe4,2, Stephen Bartol1,5,2, Muwaffak Abdulhak1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECT Given the scrutiny of spine surgery by policy makers, spine surgeons are motivated to demonstrate and improve outcomes, by determining which patients will and will not benefit from surgery, and to reduce costs, often by reducing complications. Insurers are similarly motivated. In 2013, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) and Blue Care Network (BCN) established the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) as a Collaborative Quality Initiative (CQI). MSSIC is one of the newest of 21 other CQIs that have significantly improved-and continue to improve-the quality of patient care throughout the state of Michigan. METHODS MSSIC focuses on lumbar and cervical spine surgery, specifically indications such as stenosis, disk herniation, and degenerative disease. Surgery for tumors, traumatic fractures, deformity, scoliosis, and acute spinal cord injury are currently not within the scope of MSSIC. Starting in 2014, MSSIC consisted of 7 hospitals and in 2015 included another 15 hospitals, for a total of 22 hospitals statewide. A standardized data set is obtained by data abstractors, who are funded by BCBSM/BCN. Variables of interest include indications for surgery, baseline patient-reported outcome measures, and medical history. These are obtained within 30 days of surgery. Outcome instruments used include the EQ-5D general health state score (0 being worst and 100 being the best health one can imagine) and EQ-5D-3 L. For patients undergoing lumbar surgery, a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for leg and back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index for back pain are collected. For patients undergoing cervical surgery, a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for arm and neck pain, Neck Disability Index, and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score are collected. Surgical details, postoperative hospital course, and patient-reported outcome measures are collected at 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year intervals. RESULTS As of July 1, 2015, a total of 6397 cases have been entered into the registry. This number reflects 4824 eligible cases with confirmed surgery dates. Of these 4824 eligible cases, 3338 cases went beyond the 120-day window and were considered eligible for the extraction of surgical details, 90-day outcomes, and adverse events. Among these 3338 patients, there are a total of 2469 lumbar cases, 862 cervical cases, and 7 combined procedures that were entered into the registry. CONCLUSIONS In addition to functioning as a registry, MSSIC is also meant to be a platform for quality improvement with the potential for future initiatives and best practices to be implemented statewide in order to improve quality and lower costs. With its current rate of recruitment and expansion, MSSIC will provide a robust platform as a regional prospective registry. Its unique funding model, which is supported by BCBSM/BCN, will help ensure its longevity and viability, as has been observed in other CQIs that have been active for several years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCBSM = Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan; BCN = Blue Care Network; CQI = Collaborative Quality Initiative; DVT = deep venous thrombosis; FTE = full-time employee; IRB = institutional review board; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; MSSIC = Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative; MUSIC = Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative; N2QOD = National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database; NDI = neck disability index; NRS = numeric rating scale; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PRO = patient-reported outcome; QI = quality improvement; RN = registered nurse; mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association; prospective database; quality improvement; spine registry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621421     DOI: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  3 in total

1.  The influence of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on patient discharge disposition following minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mohamed Macki; Hassan A Fadel; Travis Hamilton; Seokchun Lim; Lara W Massie; Hesham Mostafa Zakaria; Jacob Pawloski; Victor Chang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Jamie R F Wilson; Jetan H Badhiwala; Carlo Santaguida; Michael H Weber; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

3.  The role of surgery for treatment of low back pain: insights from the randomized controlled Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trials.

Authors:  Peter Abraham; Robert C Rennert; Joel R Martin; Joseph Ciacci; William Taylor; Daniel Resnick; Ekkehard Kasper; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-04-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.