INTRODUCTION: The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap has long been regarded as the second choice flap for autologous breast reconstruction following a mastectomy in our department. Despite uncertainty about donor-site morbidity, it is regarded as a relatively safe procedure; moreover, in contrast to our first choice, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, no microsurgical expertise is needed. METHODS: This is a systematic review of patient files for all LD breast reconstructions performed in the 2004-2013 period, at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. RESULTS: A total of 135 unilateral LD breast reconstructions were performed in 126 women during the ten-year period. The median age of the women was 48.5 years, and they mainly had secondary reconstruction (90%). The average time to removal of the last drain was 6.3 days, and the average time to discharge was 6.9 days. A total of 13 patients (10%) had local complications and were re-operated within the first 30 days. We observed one flap loss and only one systemic complication; a urinary tract infection. In all, 38 patients (28%) received antibiotic treatment after the operations and 27 (20%) developed a seroma at the donor site on the back. Patients who developed seroma were four times as likely as those who did not to be readmitted for antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: LD breast reconstruction remains a safe choice for autologous breast reconstruction. Prevention of donor-site seroma as well as improvement of the clinical pathway and post-operative regimen could be future focus-points for this procedure. FUNDING: The review was performed as part of the pre-graduate research year project, "Donor-site morbidity after m. latissimus dorsi reconstruction", funded by Concordiafonden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
INTRODUCTION: The latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap has long been regarded as the second choice flap for autologous breast reconstruction following a mastectomy in our department. Despite uncertainty about donor-site morbidity, it is regarded as a relatively safe procedure; moreover, in contrast to our first choice, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, no microsurgical expertise is needed. METHODS: This is a systematic review of patient files for all LD breast reconstructions performed in the 2004-2013 period, at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. RESULTS: A total of 135 unilateral LD breast reconstructions were performed in 126 women during the ten-year period. The median age of the women was 48.5 years, and they mainly had secondary reconstruction (90%). The average time to removal of the last drain was 6.3 days, and the average time to discharge was 6.9 days. A total of 13 patients (10%) had local complications and were re-operated within the first 30 days. We observed one flap loss and only one systemic complication; a urinary tract infection. In all, 38 patients (28%) received antibiotic treatment after the operations and 27 (20%) developed a seroma at the donor site on the back. Patients who developed seroma were four times as likely as those who did not to be readmitted for antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: LD breast reconstruction remains a safe choice for autologous breast reconstruction. Prevention of donor-site seroma as well as improvement of the clinical pathway and post-operative regimen could be future focus-points for this procedure. FUNDING: The review was performed as part of the pre-graduate research year project, "Donor-site morbidity after m. latissimus dorsi reconstruction", funded by Concordiafonden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.