OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap and limberg transposition flap used to treat recurrent sacrococcygeal PSD. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively between January 2008 to December 2013. Fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap was performed in 25 patients (Group VYF), and limberg transposition flap repair was performed in 33 patients (Group LTF). Patient demographics, operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded then retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (p = 0.69), sex ratio (p = 0.48), and concomitant diseases (p = 0.98) were not statistically different when compared the VYF with LTF groups. Mean operative time was 55 ± 19 min for the LTF group and 75 ± 25 min for the VYF group (p = 0.01). When length of hospital stay were compared, there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.01). Return to work was carryed out after a mean of 23 ± 1.1 days in VYF group and 16.7 ± 1.2 days in LTF group, which is significantly different (p < 0.0004). Between the groups, there was no significantly different regarding surgical complication and recurrent rate. Only one recurrence (4%) was found in VYF group. CONCLUSION: Limberg transposition flap may be use in recurrent cases of PSD, because of the lower recurrence rate and less hospital stay time, early return to work. Most important advantage of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap is the ability to close larger defects in recurrent cases.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap and limberg transposition flap used to treat recurrent sacrococcygeal PSD. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus who underwent surgery were evaluated retrospectively between January 2008 to December 2013. Fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap was performed in 25 patients (Group VYF), and limberg transposition flap repair was performed in 33 patients (Group LTF). Patient demographics, operative and postoperative outcomes were recorded then retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (p = 0.69), sex ratio (p = 0.48), and concomitant diseases (p = 0.98) were not statistically different when compared the VYF with LTF groups. Mean operative time was 55 ± 19 min for the LTF group and 75 ± 25 min for the VYF group (p = 0.01). When length of hospital stay were compared, there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.01). Return to work was carryed out after a mean of 23 ± 1.1 days in VYF group and 16.7 ± 1.2 days in LTF group, which is significantly different (p < 0.0004). Between the groups, there was no significantly different regarding surgical complication and recurrent rate. Only one recurrence (4%) was found in VYF group. CONCLUSION: Limberg transposition flap may be use in recurrent cases of PSD, because of the lower recurrence rate and less hospital stay time, early return to work. Most important advantage of fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap is the ability to close larger defects in recurrent cases.
Authors: V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yavuz Savas Koca; Ihsan Yildiz; Selahittin Koray Okur; Bekir Saricik; Mustafa Uğur; Mustafa Tevfik Bulbul; Fuat Uslusoy; İbrahim Barut Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2018-02-04