J A Batsis1,2,3,4,5, T A Mackenzie2, S J Bartels2,3,4, K R Sahakyan6, V K Somers6, F Lopez-Jimenez6. 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 2. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA. 3. Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. 4. Health Promotion Research Center at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA. 5. Dartmouth Weight and Wellness Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 6. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Body composition changes with aging lead to increased adiposity and decreased muscle mass, making the diagnosis of obesity challenging. Conventional anthropometry, including body mass index (BMI), while easy to use clinically may misrepresent adiposity. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of BMI using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in assessing the degree of obesity in older adults. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004 were used to identify adults aged ⩾60 years with DEXA measures. They were categorized (yes/no) as having elevated body fat by gender (men: ⩾25%; women ⩾35%) and by BMI ⩾25 and ⩾30 kg m(-)(2). The diagnostic performance of BMI was assessed. Metabolic characteristics were compared in discordant cases of BMI/body fat. Weighting and analyses were performed per NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 4984 subjects (men: 2453; women: 2531). Mean BMI and % body fat was 28.0 kg m(-2) and 30.8% in men, and 28.5 kg m(-)(2) and 42.1% in women. A BMI ⩾30 kg m(-)(2) had a low sensitivity and moderately high specificity (men: 32.9 and 80.8%, concordance index 0.66; women: 38.5 and 78.5%, concordance 0.69) correctly classifying 41.0 and 45.1% of obese subjects. A BMI ⩾25 kg m(-2) had a moderately high sensitivity and specificity (men: 80.7 and 99.6%, concordance 0.81; women: 76.9 and 98.8%, concordance 0.84) correctly classifying 80.8 and 78.5% of obese subjects. In subjects with BMI <30 kg m(-)(2), body fat was considered elevated in 67.1% and 61.5% of men and women, respectively. For a BMI ⩾30 kg m(-)(2), sensitivity drops from 40.3% to 14.5% and 44.5% to 23.4%, whereas specificity remains elevated (>98%), in men and women, respectively, in those 60-69.9 years to subjects aged ⩾80 years. Correct classification of obesity using a cutoff of 30 kg m(-)(2) drops from 48.1 to 23.9% and 49.0 to 19.6%, in men and women in these two age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional measures poorly identify obesity in the elderly. In older adults, BMI may be a suboptimal marker for adiposity.
BACKGROUND: Body composition changes with aging lead to increased adiposity and decreased muscle mass, making the diagnosis of obesity challenging. Conventional anthropometry, including body mass index (BMI), while easy to use clinically may misrepresent adiposity. We determined the diagnostic accuracy of BMI using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in assessing the degree of obesity in older adults. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004 were used to identify adults aged ⩾60 years with DEXA measures. They were categorized (yes/no) as having elevated body fat by gender (men: ⩾25%; women ⩾35%) and by BMI ⩾25 and ⩾30 kg m(-)(2). The diagnostic performance of BMI was assessed. Metabolic characteristics were compared in discordant cases of BMI/body fat. Weighting and analyses were performed per NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 4984 subjects (men: 2453; women: 2531). Mean BMI and % body fat was 28.0 kg m(-2) and 30.8% in men, and 28.5 kg m(-)(2) and 42.1% in women. A BMI ⩾30 kg m(-)(2) had a low sensitivity and moderately high specificity (men: 32.9 and 80.8%, concordance index 0.66; women: 38.5 and 78.5%, concordance 0.69) correctly classifying 41.0 and 45.1% of obese subjects. A BMI ⩾25 kg m(-2) had a moderately high sensitivity and specificity (men: 80.7 and 99.6%, concordance 0.81; women: 76.9 and 98.8%, concordance 0.84) correctly classifying 80.8 and 78.5% of obese subjects. In subjects with BMI <30 kg m(-)(2), body fat was considered elevated in 67.1% and 61.5% of men and women, respectively. For a BMI ⩾30 kg m(-)(2), sensitivity drops from 40.3% to 14.5% and 44.5% to 23.4%, whereas specificity remains elevated (>98%), in men and women, respectively, in those 60-69.9 years to subjects aged ⩾80 years. Correct classification of obesity using a cutoff of 30 kg m(-)(2) drops from 48.1 to 23.9% and 49.0 to 19.6%, in men and women in these two age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Traditional measures poorly identify obesity in the elderly. In older adults, BMI may be a suboptimal marker for adiposity.
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kelsey H Collins; Behnam Sharif; Claudia Sanmartin; Raylene A Reimer; Walter Herzog; Rick Chin; Deborah A Marshall Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2017-03-01
Authors: J A Batsis; T A Mackenzie; E Vasquez; C M Germain; R T Emeny; P Rippberger; F Lopez-Jimenez; S J Bartels Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: J Fernandes de Souza Barbosa; C Dos Santos Gomes; J Vilton Costa; T Ahmed; M V Zunzunegui; C-L Curcio; F Gomez; R Oliveira Guerra Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: John A Batsis; Lydia E Gill; Rebecca K Masutani; Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Heather B Blunt; Pamela J Bagley; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Stephen J Bartels Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.562