Literature DB >> 26620199

Stakeholders' Perceptions Regarding the Use of Patient Photographs Integrated with Medical Imaging Studies.

Gelareh Sadigh1, Kimberly E Applegate1,2, Timothy W Ng1, Kamilah A Hendrix2, Srini Tridandapani3,4.   

Abstract

Integrating digital facial photographs of pediatric patients as identifiers (ID) with medical imaging (integrated photographic IDs) may increase the detection of mislabeled studies. The purpose of this study was to determine how different stakeholders would receive this novel technology. Parents or guardians of patients in a children's hospital outpatient radiology department, radiology faculty and residents, and radiology technologists and nurses were asked to complete a survey. The perception about the anticipated use of integrated photographic ID in different clinical scenarios was investigated, and its predictors were determined using logistic regression analysis. Four hundred ninety-eight parents responded (response rate 83 %); 96 and 97 % supported the use of integrated photographic ID, if it improves the radiologist's imaging interpretation or decreases the rate of mislabeled errors, respectively. Thirty-eight percent were worried that photographic IDs would impact patients' privacy. Ninety-four percent believed that they should be asked for their consent prior to obtaining their child's photograph. Seventy-eight radiologists responded (response rate 39 %); 63 and 59 % believed that the use of integrated photographic ID would result in improvement in accurate interpretation of images and identification of mislabeled patient errors, respectively. Forty-nine percent of radiologists had concern that integrated photographic ID would increase interpretation time. Fifty technologists and nurses responded (response rate 59 %); 71 and 73 % supported the technology if it resulted in more acute interpretation of images and identification of mislabeled patients, respectively. A majority of stakeholders support integrated photographic ID in order to improve safety. A majority of parents believe that consent should be obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; Integrated photographic identifiers; Quality and safety; Radiology; Wrong-patient error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26620199      PMCID: PMC4879037          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9850-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

1.  The use of patient pictures and verification screens to reduce computerized provider order entry errors.

Authors:  Daniel Hyman; Mariel Laire; Diane Redmond; David W Kaplan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  A novel technology for automatically obtaining digital facial photographs near-simultaneously with portable radiographs.

Authors:  Senthil Ramamurthy; Pamela Bhatti; Farasat Munir; Timothy Ng; Kimberly Applegate; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effect of viewing patient photographs on radiologist interpretation of CT studies.

Authors:  John Ryan; Gul-E Khanda; Rebecca Hibbert; Shawna Duigenan; Adam Tunis; Najla Fasih; Blair MacDonald; Mohammed El-Khoudary; Ania Kielar; Matthew McInnes; Vivek Virmani; Nitin Ramamurthy; Nick Kolenko; Adnan Sheikh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  He thought the "lady in the door" was the "lady in the window": a qualitative study of patient identification practices.

Authors:  Etienne Phipps; Marian Turkel; Elizabeth R Mackenzie; Carlos Urrea
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2012-03

5.  JOURNAL CLUB: Evaluation of Near-Miss Wrong-Patient Events in Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Gelareh Sadigh; Thomas Loehfelm; Kimberly E Applegate; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Increasing rate of detection of wrong-patient radiographs: use of photographs obtained at time of radiography.

Authors:  Srini Tridandapani; Senthil Ramamurthy; Samuel J Galgano; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.

Authors:  John T James
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Photography, patient consent and scientific publications: medicolegal aspects in France.

Authors:  Nicolas Franchitto; Laurent Gavarri; Fabrice Dédouit; Norbert Telmon; Daniel Rougé
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 1.614

9.  A multiobserver study of the effects of including point-of-care patient photographs with portable radiography: a means to detect wrong-patient errors.

Authors:  Srini Tridandapani; Senthil Ramamurthy; James Provenzale; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael G Evanoff; Pamela Bhatti
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Integrating patient digital photographs with medical imaging examinations.

Authors:  Senthil Ramamurthy; Pamela Bhatti; Chesnal D Arepalli; Mohamed Salama; James M Provenzale; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Patient Photos on Detection Accuracy, Decision Confidence and Eye-Tracking Parameters in Chest and Abdomen Images with Tubes and Lines.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.