Literature DB >> 26619787

The right inferior frontal cortex in response inhibition: A tDCS-ERP co-registration study.

Toni Cunillera1, Debora Brignani2, David Cucurell3, Lluís Fuentemilla4, Carlo Miniussi5.   

Abstract

In any given common situation, when an individual controls him/herself or obeys and stops a current action when asked to do, it is because the brain executes an inhibitory process. This ability is essential for adaptive behaviour, and it is also a requirement for accurate performance in daily life. It has been suggested that there are two main inhibitory functions related to behaviour, as inhibition is observed to affect behaviour at different time intervals. Proactive inhibition permits the subject to control his behavioural response over time by creating a response tendency, while reactive inhibition is considered to be a process that usually inhibits an already initiated response. In this context, it has been established that inhibitory function is implemented by specific fronto-basal-ganglia circuits. In the present study, we investigated the role of the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC) in response inhibition by combining into a single task the Go-NoGo task and the Stop-Signal task. Concurrently, we applied transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the IFC and recorded electroencephalography (EEG). Thus, we obtained online EEG measurements of the tDCS-induced modifications in the IFC together with the participant's performance in a response inhibition task. We found that applying bilateral tDCS on the IFC (right anodal/left cathodal) significantly increased proactive inhibition, although the behavioural parameters indicative of reactive inhibition were unaffected by the stimulation. Finally, the inhibitory-P3 component reflected a similar modulation under both inhibitory conditions induced by the stimulation. Our data indicates that an online tDCS-ERP approach is achievable, but that a tDCS bilateral montage may not be the most efficient one for modulating the rIFC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26619787     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Dimensional bias and adaptive adjustments in inhibitory control of monkeys.

Authors:  Sadegh Ghasemian; Marzieh M Vardanjani; Vahid Sheibani; Farshad A Mansouri
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Kenneth Chelette; Jacek Dmochowski; Adam J Woods; Emily S Kappenman; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Got chocolate? Bilateral prefrontal cortex stimulation augments chocolate consumption.

Authors:  Chan To; Mary Falcone; James Loughead; Erin Logue-Chamberlain; Roy Hamilton; Joseph Kable; Caryn Lerman; Rebecca L Ashare
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study.

Authors:  Etienne Sallard; Michael Mouthon; Michael De Pretto; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  tDCS over the inferior frontal gyri and visual cortices did not improve response inhibition.

Authors:  Christina Thunberg; Mari S Messel; Liisa Raud; René J Huster
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Effect of Prior Knowledge of Color on Behavioral Responses and Event-Related Potentials During Go/No-go Task.

Authors:  Nami Kubo; Tatsunori Watanabe; Xiaoxiao Chen; Takuya Matsumoto; Keisuke Yunoki; Takayuki Kuwabara; Hikari Kirimoto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Controlling the Emotional Bias: Performance, Late Positive Potentials, and the Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Florian Faehling; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus Attenuates Skin Conductance Responses to Unpredictable Threat Conditions.

Authors:  Martin J Herrmann; Jennifer S Beier; Bibiane Simons; Thomas Polak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects performance in Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART).

Authors:  Heng Guo; Zhuoran Zhang; Shu Da; Xiaotian Sheng; Xichao Zhang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.