Khrishen Cunnusamy1, Charles B Bowman, Walter Beebe, Xin Gong, R Nick Hogan, V Vinod Mootha. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; †Cornea Associates of Texas, Dallas, TX; and ‡McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development/Center for Human Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe 2 cases of congenital corneal endothelial edema resulting from novel de novo mutations. METHODS: Case A patient was a 15-month-old white child and case B patient was a 3-year-old Hispanic child presenting with bilateral cloudy corneas since birth. Clinicopathologic findings are presented. DNA samples were screened for mutations in candidate genes by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Slit-lamp examination of case A patient revealed stromal edema and haze. Histology of the keratoplasty button showed stromal thickening with loss of endothelium and thin Descemet membrane. Sanger sequencing established the diagnosis of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy by detection of a compound heterozygous mutation in SLC4A11. The proband displayed a novel de novo frameshift mutation in one SLC4A11 allele, p.(Pro817Argfs*32), in conjunction with a maternally inherited missense mutation in SLC4A11, p.(Arg869His). Case B patient similarly presented with stromal edema and stromal haze. Histopathologic analysis revealed a spongy epithelium, focal discontinuities in Bowman layer, stromal thickening with areas of compacted posterior stroma, variable thickness of Descemet membrane, and regional multilayered endothelium. Sanger sequencing found a novel de novo nonsense mutation in the first exon of ZEB1, p.(Cys7*). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, we report the earliest clinical presentation of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy resulting from a de novo mutation in ZEB1. Additionally, we present a congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy case with a thin Descemet membrane with a novel compound heterozygous SLC4A11 mutation. In the absence of a family history or consanguinity, de novo mutations may result in congenital corneal endothelial dystrophies.
PURPOSE: To describe 2 cases of congenital corneal endothelial edema resulting from novel de novo mutations. METHODS: Case A patient was a 15-month-old white child and case B patient was a 3-year-old Hispanic child presenting with bilateral cloudy corneas since birth. Clinicopathologic findings are presented. DNA samples were screened for mutations in candidate genes by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Slit-lamp examination of case A patient revealed stromal edema and haze. Histology of the keratoplasty button showed stromal thickening with loss of endothelium and thin Descemet membrane. Sanger sequencing established the diagnosis of congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy by detection of a compound heterozygous mutation in SLC4A11. The proband displayed a novel de novo frameshift mutation in one SLC4A11 allele, p.(Pro817Argfs*32), in conjunction with a maternally inherited missense mutation in SLC4A11, p.(Arg869His). Case B patient similarly presented with stromal edema and stromal haze. Histopathologic analysis revealed a spongy epithelium, focal discontinuities in Bowman layer, stromal thickening with areas of compacted posterior stroma, variable thickness of Descemet membrane, and regional multilayered endothelium. Sanger sequencing found a novel de novo nonsense mutation in the first exon of ZEB1, p.(Cys7*). CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, we report the earliest clinical presentation of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy resulting from a de novo mutation in ZEB1. Additionally, we present a congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy case with a thin Descemet membrane with a novel compound heterozygous SLC4A11 mutation. In the absence of a family history or consanguinity, de novo mutations may result in congenital corneal endothelial dystrophies.
Authors: Supriya S Jalimarada; Diego G Ogando; Eranga N Vithana; Joseph A Bonanno Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Soo Yeon Kim; Orkun Muftuoglu; R Nick Hogan; R Wayne Bowman; H Dwight Cavanagh; James P McCulley; V Vinod Mootha Journal: Cornea Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Gonzalo L Vilas; Sampath K Loganathan; Jun Liu; Andri K Riau; James D Young; Jodhbir S Mehta; Eranga N Vithana; Joseph R Casey Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Lubica Dudakova; Viktor Stranecky; Lenka Piherova; Tomas Palecek; Nikolas Pontikos; Stanislav Kmoch; Pavlina Skalicka; Manuela Vaneckova; Alice E Davidson; Petra Liskova Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Wenlin Zhang; Ricardo Frausto; Doug D Chung; Christopher G Griffis; Liyo Kao; Angela Chen; Rustam Azimov; Alapakkam P Sampath; Ira Kurtz; Anthony J Aldave Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kristyna Brejchova; Lubica Dudakova; Pavlina Skalicka; Robert Dobrovolny; Petr Masek; Martina Putzova; Mariya Moosajee; Stephen J Tuft; Alice E Davidson; Petra Liskova Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799