Literature DB >> 26618912

The time course of familiar metonymy.

Lewis Bott1, Alice Rees1, Steven Frisson2.   

Abstract

Metonymic words have multiple related meanings, such as college, as in the building ("John walked into the college") or the educational institution ("John was promoted by the college"). Most researchers have found support for direct access models of metonymy but one recent study, Lowder and Gordon (2013), found delayed reading times for metonymic sentences relative to literal controls, in support of an indirect access account. We conducted a speed-accuracy-tradeoff experiment to test whether their result was caused by lower retrieval probabilities, consistent with direct or indirect access models of metonymy, or slower retrieval dynamics, consistent only with indirect access accounts. We found lower retrieval probabilities for the metonymic sentences but no difference in the dynamics parameters. These results therefore suggest that literal senses do not have priority during processing and that established metonymic senses can be accessed directly. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618912     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  2 in total

1.  Metonymy Processing in Chinese: A Linguistic Context-Sensitive Eye-Tracking Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Xianglan Chen; Hulin Ren; XiaoYing Yan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-27

2.  COVID-19 myth-busting: an experimental study.

Authors:  Aimée Challenger; Petroc Sumner; Lewis Bott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.