Literature DB >> 26618908

People mind wander more during massed than spaced inductive learning.

Janet Metcalfe1, Judy Xu1.   

Abstract

This article investigates the relation between mind wandering and the spacing effect in inductive learning. Participants studied works of art by different artists grouped in blocks, where works by a particular artist were either presented all together successively (the massed condition), or interleaved with the works of other artists (the spaced condition). The works of 24 artists were shown, with 12, 15, or 18 works by each artist being provided as exemplars. Later, different works by the same artists were presented for a test of the artists' identity. During the course of studying these works, participants were probed for mind wandering. It was found that people mind wandered more when the exemplars were presented in a massed rather than in a spaced manner, especially as the task progressed. There was little mind wandering and little difference between massed and spaced conditions toward the beginning of study. People were better able to correctly attribute the new works to the appropriate artist (inductive learning) when (a) they were in the spaced condition and (b) they had not been mind wandering. This research suggests that inductive learning may be influenced by mind wandering and that the impairment in learning with massed practice (compared to spaced practice) may be attributable, at least in part, to attentional factors-people are "on task" less fully when the stimuli are massed rather than spaced. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618908     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Attenuation of deep semantic processing during mind wandering: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Judy Xu; David Friedman; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Studying in the region of proximal learning reduces mind wandering.

Authors:  Judy Xu; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  A mind-wandering account of the testing effect: Does context variation matter?

Authors:  Sarah Shi Hui Wong; Stephen Wee Hun Lim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  What Is the Mechanism Underlying the Interleaving Effect in Category Induction: An Eye-Tracking and Behavioral Study.

Authors:  Yabo Ge; Fengying Li; Xinyu Li; Weijian Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 5.  Mind wandering perspective on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Natali S Bozhilova; Giorgia Michelini; Jonna Kuntsi; Philip Asherson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 6.  Evidence of the Spacing Effect and Influences on Perceptions of Learning and Science Curricula.

Authors:  Xuechen Yuan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.