Gemma Crundwell1, Phil Gomersall1,2, David M Baguley1,2. 1. a Audiology Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK. 2. b Vision and Hearing Sciences Department, Anglia Ruskin University , Cambridge , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Drug-mediated ototoxicity, specifically cochleotoxicity, is a concern for patients receiving medications for the treatment of serious illness. A number of classification schemes exist, most of which are based on pure-tone audiometry, in order to assist non-audiological/non-otological specialists in the identification and monitoring of iatrogenic hearing loss. This review identifies the primary classification systems used in cochleototoxicity monitoring. By bringing together classifications published in discipline-specific literature, the paper aims to increase awareness of their relative strengths and limitations in the assessment and monitoring of ototoxic hearing loss and to indicate how future classification systems may improve upon the status-quo. DESIGN: Literature review. STUDY SAMPLE: PubMed identified 4878 articles containing the search term ototox*. RESULTS: A systematic search identified 13 key classification systems. Cochleotoxicity classification systems can be divided into those which focus on hearing change from a baseline audiogram and those that focus on the functional impact of the hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Common weaknesses of these grading scales included a lack of sensitivity to small adverse changes in hearing thresholds, a lack of high-frequency audiometry (>8 kHz), and lack of indication of which changes are likely to be clinically significant for communication and quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: Drug-mediated ototoxicity, specifically cochleotoxicity, is a concern for patients receiving medications for the treatment of serious illness. A number of classification schemes exist, most of which are based on pure-tone audiometry, in order to assist non-audiological/non-otological specialists in the identification and monitoring of iatrogenic hearing loss. This review identifies the primary classification systems used in cochleototoxicity monitoring. By bringing together classifications published in discipline-specific literature, the paper aims to increase awareness of their relative strengths and limitations in the assessment and monitoring of ototoxic hearing loss and to indicate how future classification systems may improve upon the status-quo. DESIGN: Literature review. STUDY SAMPLE: PubMed identified 4878 articles containing the search term ototox*. RESULTS: A systematic search identified 13 key classification systems. Cochleotoxicity classification systems can be divided into those which focus on hearing change from a baseline audiogram and those that focus on the functional impact of the hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Common weaknesses of these grading scales included a lack of sensitivity to small adverse changes in hearing thresholds, a lack of high-frequency audiometry (>8 kHz), and lack of indication of which changes are likely to be clinically significant for communication and quality of life.
Authors: D Graterol; C Mir; C Garcia-Vaquero; I Braña; A N Pardo; M I Rochera-Villach; A Lyakhovich; M E LLeonart; J Lorente Journal: Int J Otolaryngol Date: 2017-07-03
Authors: Sally Cohen-Cutler; Kenneth Wong; Victoria Mena; Kevin Sianto; Michael A Wright; Arthur Olch; Etan Orgel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 8.013