Literature DB >> 26618798

The effect of a single HF-rTMS session over the left DLPFC on the physiological stress response as measured by heart rate variability.

Jonathan Remue1, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt1, Chris Baeken2, Valentina Rossi1, Jerome Tullo3, Rudi De Raedt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has demonstrated that prefrontal activity is related to control over stress responses. However, the causal mechanisms are not well understood. In this study we investigated the possible influence of brain stimulation on the physiological stress response system. Because an increased stress response is known to precipitate psychiatric disorders, further inquiry can have important clinical implications.
METHOD: In 38 healthy, right-handed female participants, we examined the effects of a single sham-controlled high-frequency (HF) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) session over the left (n = 19) and right (n = 19) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on the autonomic nervous system stress response, as measured by heart rate variability (HRV). Stress was transiently induced through evaluative negative feedbacks.
RESULTS: Although the induction procedure was efficient in increasing self-reported distress in all groups and conditions, only after real HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC the physiological stress response was diminished, as indicated by a significant increase in HRV. No effects were found in the sham or right side stimulation condition.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that increasing brain activity by HF-rTMS over the left DLPFC can help attenuating physiological stress reactions. Results are indicative of the positive effects of rTMS on stress resilience and underscore the possible benefit of HF-rTMS as a transdiagnostic intervention. Finally, the results also show that effects only occur when stimulating the left DLPFC, which is in line with the therapeutic effects of HF-rTMS in affective disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618798     DOI: 10.1037/neu0000255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  13 in total

1.  Flexible parasympathetic responses to sadness facilitate spontaneous affect regulation.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Jessica L Hamilton; David M Fresco; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Inflexibility as a Vulnerability to Depression: A Systematic Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Lauren B Alloy; David M Fresco
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Autonomic reactivity and vulnerability to depression: A multi-wave study.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Jessica L Hamilton; Thomas M Olino; David M Fresco; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-12-19

4.  Enhancing Cognitive Restructuring with Concurrent Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transdiagnostic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrada D Neacsiu; Lysianne Beynel; John P Powers; Steven T Szabo; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Sarah H Lisanby; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 17.659

5.  Impact of one HF-rTMS session over the DLPFC and motor cortex on acute hormone dynamics and emotional state in healthy adults: a sham-controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Blair T Crewther; Wiktoria Kasprzycka; Christian J Cook; Rafał Rola
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 6.  Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: The importance of the vagus nerve for biopsychosocial resilience.

Authors:  Josefien Dedoncker; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Cristina Ottaviani; George M Slavich
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 9.052

7.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the impact of a negative mood induction.

Authors:  Martin Möbius; Lylis Lacomblé; Thomas Meyer; Dennis J L G Schutter; Tom Gielkens; Eni S Becker; Indira Tendolkar; Philip van Eijndhoven
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The influence of personality on the effect of iTBS after being stressed on cortisol secretion.

Authors:  Matias M Pulopulos; Sara De Witte; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Rudi De Raedt; Johan Schiettecatte; Ellen Anckaert; Alicia Salvador; Chris Baeken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?

Authors:  Fenne M Smits; Dennis J L G Schutter; Jack van Honk; Elbert Geuze
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 10.  Applications of Non-invasive Neuromodulation for the Management of Disorders Related to COVID-19.

Authors:  Abrahão Fontes Baptista; Adriana Baltar; Alexandre Hideki Okano; Alexandre Moreira; Ana Carolina Pinheiro Campos; Ana Mércia Fernandes; André Russowsky Brunoni; Bashar W Badran; Clarice Tanaka; Daniel Ciampi de Andrade; Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado; Edgard Morya; Eduardo Trujillo; Jaiti K Swami; Joan A Camprodon; Katia Monte-Silva; Katia Nunes Sá; Isadora Nunes; Juliana Barbosa Goulardins; Marom Bikson; Pedro Sudbrack-Oliveira; Priscila de Carvalho; Rafael Jardim Duarte-Moreira; Rosana Lima Pagano; Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo; Yossi Zana
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.