Literature DB >> 26618111

How reliable is online diffusion of medical information targeting patients and families?

Pedro Xavier-Elsas1, Sandra Epifânio Bastos1, Maria Ignez C Gaspar-Elsas1.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether online diffusion of the "Ten Warning Signs of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (PID)'' adheres to accepted scientific standards.
METHODS: We analyzed how reproducible is online diffusion of a unique instrument, the "Ten Warning Signs of PID", created by the Jeffrey Modell Foundation (JMF), by Google-assisted searches among highly visited sites from professional, academic and scientific organizations; governmental agencies; and patient support/advocacy organizations. We examined the diffusion, consistency of use and adequate referencing of this instrument. Where applicable, variant versions of the instrument were examined for changes in factual content that would have practical impact on physicians or on patients and their families.
RESULTS: Among the first 100 sites identified by Google search, 85 faithfully reproduced the JMF model, and correctly referenced to its source. By contrast, the other 15 also referenced the JMF source but presented one or more changes in content relative to their purported model and therefore represent uncontrolled variants, of unknown origin. Discrepancies identified in the latter included changes in factual content of the original JMF list (C), as well as removal (R) and introduction (I) of novel signs (Table 2), all made without reference to any scientific publications that might account for the drastic changes in factual content. Factual changes include changes in the number of infectious episodes considered necessary to raise suspicion of PID, as well as the inclusion of various medical conditions not mentioned in the original. Together, these changes will affect the way physicians use the instrument to consult or to inform patients, and the way patients and families think about the need for specialist consultation in view of a possible PID diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The retrieved adaptations and variants, which significantly depart from the original instrument, raise concerns about standards for scientific information provided online to physicians, patients and families.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Expert consultation online; Infection; Information technology and human health; Online medical information; Warning signs

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618111      PMCID: PMC4655254          DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v5.i4.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Exp Med        ISSN: 2220-315X


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ten warning signs of primary immunodeficiency: a new paradigm is needed for the 21st century.

Authors:  Peter D Arkwright; Andrew R Gennery
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Francisco A Bonilla; I Leonard Bernstein; David A Khan; Zuhair K Ballas; Javier Chinen; Michael M Frank; Lisa J Kobrynski; Arnold I Levinson; Bruce Mazer; Robert P Nelson; Jordan S Orange; John M Routes; William T Shearer; Ricardo U Sorensen
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.347

3.  Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination: the current situation in Europe.

Authors:  Masoud Dara; Colleen D Acosta; Valiantsin Rusovich; Jean Pierre Zellweger; Rosella Centis; Giovanni Battista Migliori
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Clinical features that identify children with primary immunodeficiency diseases.

Authors:  Anbezhil Subbarayan; Gloria Colarusso; Stephen M Hughes; Andrew R Gennery; Mary Slatter; Andrew J Cant; Peter D Arkwright
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Clinical characteristics of pediatric patients evaluated for primary immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Andrew MacGinnitie; Frank Aloi; Seema Mishra
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.377

Review 6.  Gell and Coombs's classification: is it still valid?

Authors:  J Descotes; G Choquet-Kastylevsky
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 7.  Recent developments in tuberculosis vaccines.

Authors:  Melles Haile; Gunilla Källenius
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.915

8.  Primary immunodeficiencies: 2009 update.

Authors:  Luigi D Notarangelo; Alain Fischer; Raif S Geha; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Helen Chapel; Mary Ellen Conley; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Amos Etzioni; Lennart Hammartröm; Shigeaki Nonoyama; Hans D Ochs; Jennifer Puck; Chaim Roifman; Reinhard Seger; Josiah Wedgwood
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 9.  Primary immunodeficiency diseases: a practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  S E Turvey; F A Bonilla; A K Junker
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Consensus statement on the revised World Health Organization recommendations for BCG vaccination in HIV-infected infants.

Authors:  A C Hesseling; M F Cotton; C Fordham von Reyn; S M Graham; R P Gie; G D Hussey
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.