Literature DB >> 26617427

Assessing and analyzing change in attitudes in the classroom.

Rochelle E Tractenberg1, Ranjana Chaterji1, Aviad Haramati1.   

Abstract

We explore three analytic methods that can be used to quantify and qualify changes in attitude and similar outcomes that may be encountered in the educational context. These methods can be used or adapted whenever the outcome of interest is change in a generally unmeasurable attribute, such as attitude. The analyses we describe focus on: (1) change in total 'attitude score'; (2) item-level changes in attitudes towards different topics; and (3) 'attitude shift' that is defined based on a qualified change algorithm. In our example data, the total-score approach gives a general index to the level of positive attitude; the item-level approach gives the median level of positive attitude and indicates items with the most positive/negative attitude (i.e., items to target in future iterations). The qualified change approach provides an objective measure of whether a shift in attitude has occurred. Each analysis is described with its advantages and disadvantages using the data from a survey of 70 preclinical first and second year medical students before and after an elective 11-week interactive seminar (22 contact hours) which introduced elements of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) into programmed medical school training. When assessing changes that are more qualitative than quantitative, any of these methods can be employed to derive either descriptive or inferential statistics. The methods are straightforward and are appropriate when measurements are imperfect, ratings are subjective and differences are not necessarily absolute.

Year:  2007        PMID: 26617427      PMCID: PMC4659510          DOI: 10.1080/02602930600800854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assess Eval High Educ        ISSN: 0260-2938


  14 in total

1.  Practitioners' sources of clinical information on complementary and alternative medicine in oncology.

Authors:  Michael Joseph Dooley; Diana Yu-Lin Lee; Jennifer Lillian Marriott
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Perceptions and attitudes of clinical oncologists on complementary and alternative medicine: a nationwide survey in Japan.

Authors:  Ichinosuke Hyodo; Kenji Eguchi; Tomohiro Nishina; Hisashi Endo; Masahito Tanimizu; Ichiro Mikami; Shigemitsu Takashima; Jiro Imanishi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Implementing a research agenda for complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Jonathan D Berman; Stephen E Straus
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  Complementary and alternative medical therapies: implications for medical education.

Authors:  Miriam S Wetzel; Ted J Kaptchuk; Aviad Haramati; David M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The teaching of complementary and alternative medicine in U.S. medical schools: a survey of course directors.

Authors:  James J Brokaw; Godfrey Tunnicliff; Beat U Raess; Dale W Saxon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Attitudes toward CAM among medical, nursing, and pharmacy faculty and students: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Mary Jo Kreitzer; Denise Mitten; Ilene Harris; Janet Shandeling
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.305

8.  Complementary and alternative medicine instruction in nursing curricula.

Authors:  Arjun P Dutta; Abhirjun P Dutta; Sally Bwayo; Zhenyi Xue; Oluwaranti Akiyode; Patricia Ayuk-Egbe; Daphne Bernard; Monika N Daftary; Veronica Clarke-Tasker
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2003-12

9.  Why physicians need to look more closely at the use of complementary and alternative medicine by multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  E Pucci; E Cartechini; C Taus; G Giuliani
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.089

10.  The use of complementary and alternative medical providers by insured cancer patients in Washington State.

Authors:  William E Lafferty; Allen Bellas; Andrea Corage Baden; Patrick Timothy Tyree; Leanna J Standish; Ruth Patterson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Detecting When "Quality of Life" Has Been "Enhanced": Estimating Change in Quality of Life Ratings.

Authors:  Rochelle E Tractenberg; Futoshi Yumoto; Paul S Aisen
Journal:  Open J Philos       Date:  2013-11-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.