Literature DB >> 26617102

Nonpolar Solvation Free Energies of Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Samuel Genheden1, Jacob Kongsted1, Pär Söderhjelm1, Ulf Ryde1.   

Abstract

Recent investigations have indicated that different solvation methods give qualitatively different results for the nonpolar solvation contribution to ligand-binding affinities. Therefore, we have calculated the nonpolar solvation contribution to the free energy of benzene binding to the T4 lysozyme Leu99Ala mutant using thermodynamic integration (TI) and three approximate methods. The total binding free energy was calculated with TI and then decomposed into contributions from the solvent and the solute. The nonpolar contribution from the solute was compared to approximate methods within the framework of the molecular-mechanics and generalized Born with surface area method (MM/GBSA). First, the nonpolar solvation energy was calculated with a linear relation to the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA). Second, a recent approach that divides the nonpolar solvation energy into cavity and dispersion parts was used, and third, the nonpolar solvation energy was calculated with the polarized continuum model (PCM). Surprisingly, the simple SASA estimate reproduces the TI results best. However, the reason for this is that all continuum methods assume that the benzene cavity is filled with water for the free protein, contrary to both experimental and simulation results. We present a method to avoid this assumption and then, PCM provides results that are closest to the results obtained with TI.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 26617102     DOI: 10.1021/ct100272s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  7 in total

1.  Binding affinities in the SAMPL3 trypsin and host-guest blind tests estimated with the MM/PBSA and LIE methods.

Authors:  Paulius Mikulskis; Samuel Genheden; Patrik Rydberg; Lars Sandberg; Lars Olsen; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; David A Case
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Interaction of Pelargonium sidoides Compounds with Lactoferrin and SARS-CoV-2: Insights from Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Federico Iacovelli; Gaetana Costanza; Alice Romeo; Terenzio Cosio; Caterina Lanna; Antonino Bagnulo; Umberto Di Maio; Alice Sbardella; Roberta Gaziano; Sandro Grelli; Ettore Squillaci; Alessandro Miani; Prisco Piscitelli; Luca Bianchi; Mattia Falconi; Elena Campione
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Effects of H2A.B incorporation on nucleosome structures and dynamics.

Authors:  Havva Kohestani; Jeff Wereszczynski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

6.  In silico prediction of mutant HIV-1 proteases cleaving a target sequence.

Authors:  Jan H Jensen; Martin Willemoës; Jakob R Winther; Luca De Vico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Binding mode and free energy prediction of fisetin/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes.

Authors:  Bodee Nutho; Wasinee Khuntawee; Chompoonut Rungnim; Piamsook Pongsawasdi; Peter Wolschann; Alfred Karpfen; Nawee Kungwan; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.