Literature DB >> 26616915

DNA replication stress and cancer: cause or cure?

Elaine M Taylor1, Howard D Lindsay1.   

Abstract

There is an extensive and growing body of evidence that DNA replication stress is a major driver in the development and progression of many cancers, and that these cancers rely heavily on replication stress response pathways for their continued proliferation. This raises the possibility that the pathways that ordinarily protect cells from the accumulation of cancer-causing mutations may actually prove to be effective therapeutic targets for a wide range of malignancies. In this review, we explore the mechanisms by which sustained proliferation can lead to replication stress and genome instability, and discuss how the pattern of mutations observed in human cancers is supportive of this oncogene-induced replication stress model. Finally, we go on to consider the implications of replication stress both as a prognostic indicator and, more encouragingly, as a potential target in cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATR; CHK1; genome instability; oncogenes; replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26616915     DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  17 in total

Review 1.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  MRE11 Promotes Tumorigenesis by Facilitating Resistance to Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress.

Authors:  Elizabeth Spehalski; Kayla M Capper; Cheryl J Smith; Mary J Morgan; Maria Dinkelmann; Jeffrey Buis; JoAnn M Sekiguchi; David O Ferguson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Impact of Replication Stress in Human Papillomavirus Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Cary A Moody
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Tumour growth environment modulates Chk1 signalling pathways and Chk1 inhibitor sensitivity.

Authors:  Andrew J Massey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Model to Investigate Single-Strand DNA Responses in G1 Human Cells via a Telomere-Targeted, Nuclease-Deficient CRISPR-Cas9 System.

Authors:  Remco P Crefcoeur; Omar Zgheib; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Effects of Replication and Transcription on DNA Structure-Related Genetic Instability.

Authors:  Guliang Wang; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Modification of tumour cell metabolism modulates sensitivity to Chk1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Andrew J Massey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Cip29 is phosphorylated following activation of the DNA damage response in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  Janet Holden; Elaine M Taylor; Howard D Lindsay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The well-accepted notion that gene amplification contributes to increased expression still remains, after all these years, a reasonable but unproven assumption.

Authors:  Yuping Jia; Lichan Chen; Qingwen Jia; Xixi Dou; Ningzhi Xu; Dezhong Joshua Liao
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2016-05-20

10.  Cooperative oncogenic effect and cell signaling crosstalk of co‑occurring HER2 and mutant PIK3CA in mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Lun Dong; Fanyan Meng; Ling Wu; Allison V Mitchell; C James Block; Bin Zhang; Douglas B Craig; Hyejeong Jang; Wei Chen; Qifeng Yang; Guojun Wu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.