Literature DB >> 26616691

Open and Closed Rhinoplasty.

Ashley Cafferty1, Daniel G Becker2.   

Abstract

Most surgeons recognize the broad utility of both endonasal and external rhinoplasty approaches. Most understand that there are situations when a given approach offers advantages and may be considered preferable. In this article, the anatomy, incisions, and approaches that are available to the surgeon are reviewed. General indications are discussed for the external and endonasal approaches. The pros and cons of each approach are discussed, and further thoughts on the decision-making process are provided.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Intercartilaginous; Marginal; Rhinoplasty; Transcartilaginous; Transcolumellar

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26616691     DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Plast Surg        ISSN: 0094-1298            Impact factor:   2.017


  4 in total

1.  Healing acceleration of mastoidectomy through the external auditory canal incisionless approach.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Closed Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience of 238 Cases over 2 Years.

Authors:  Saif Al Azzawi; Thomas Kidd; Taimur Shoaib
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  Outcome-based Comparative Study to Examine the Correction of Columella Deformitiesfollowing Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Rajan Uppal; Ali H Yousif; Kavish Maheshwari
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-27

4.  A Modified Closed-Open Approach as Part of a Graduated and Integrative Approach to Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jonas Röjdmark; Agko Mouchammed
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2019-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.